March 02, 2013  HLS CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE - Inquiry sent to Rep Mike Shirkey, Rep Matt Lori, and Sen. John Proos

----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: "State Rep Mike Shirkey" <MikeShirkey@house.mi.gov>; "Rep. Matt Lori (District 59)" <dist059@house.mi.gov>; "John Proos"
<senjproos@senate.michigan.gov>
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: HLS Constitution free zone

    REP Mike Shirkey,Rep Matt Lori and Senator John Proos  What is your view on the HLS constitutional free zone? Are they stepping on states rights? Do you think
    HLS has the right or any authority to strip Michigan of the constitution? Acts like this are what make both of our issues very important. Thank You For Your Time.
    Charlie Forster
    Jones Michigan
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
COMMUNICATION WITH REP. MIKE SHIRKEY

----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65)
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

    Hello this is the very reason you must include all legal arms! Most all of the common name  gun makers are owned by one of George Soros's fence company's and
    are or will be made in china.  If you could  get the property tax rate down to what it was in the 1930's and get rid of the Michigan income tax  someone might think
    about coming in. When I was a young man working we had no state income tax! The income tax was put on to pay for the bridge and the politicons of the day said
    when the bridge was payed for the tax would come off or be repealed!!  What is the hold up?
    Maybe we should look up and see when the bridge was paid off and start charging you folks interest on the  monies extorted since. Charlie

    On 03/01/2013 01:48 PM, Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65) wrote:
    Hello
    We do not have details on gun manufacturers in MI.  We have no major makers, but are hoping to attract larger manufacturers from other states that have excessive
    gun control laws.  Smaller mom and pop manufacturers that are here may also expand with a better environment; you never know where the next Glock may spring
    from.  The main sponsor of that bill may have additional information if you contact their office.
    In answer to your other question, here is a link to when Mack will be in Michigan:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=sheriff+richard+mack+clinton+county&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1
    Have a safe weekend
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Best Guns And  Freedom Video Around (0nly 7.5 minutes)
In short order, this video slices through the spin and clearly exposes the truth about gun control. So tastefully done it will open the eyes of many a fence sitter who's
started noticing the bad smell coming from DC.  
VIDEO  [link below]
Grace and Peace,
-Bob
~submitted by Robert L
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_T-F_zfoDqI

March 01, 2013  SOME OF YOU STILL DON'T GET IT - by Neil
Just fair warning, this one is a tad bit long, even for me.
My last article garnered a comment from someone I know that proves that I was right when I said that most people couldn’t name even five of the rights protected by the
Bill of Rights. This person, who I won’t mention, but who knows who they are, said that I was nuts because we can still exercise all our rights. So I asked them to name
five of the rights, just as the article said. The first thing they said was freedom of speech, followed by a long pause. So I prodded, what else? Then they blurted out I plead
the fifth. To which I replied, you ought to before you make a bigger fool of yourself than you already have. Of course that didn’t go over too well, but it proved my point
that most people CAN’T name the rights which our Founders felt were so important that they listed them individually in the Bill of Rights
.
READ MORE

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
INTERNET KEEPING KIDS FROM GRANDPARENTS
----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxxx@att.net
To: Bonnie
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Internet Keeping Kids from Grandparents

    I just read online the headline of how the Internet is keeping kids from grandparents...so it goes besides gaming that is destroying families but it said that because
    kids can find out whatever they need to know from internet they don't need to go to grandma any longer for any wisdom. Sad...

[My thought:  I decided to post this because it speaks volumes to  what has happened across our country. A sense of family, values, virtue, principles and our American
Heritage is no longer being passed along from generation to generation.  Our children are no longer being taught the true history of our founding but instead are being
programmed by the propaganda machine referred to as state (public) schools. So, if our heritage from our parents and grandparents is being replaced with the Internet,
we've truly lost our nation folks. We are just as complicit for failing to protect our children from those that will use them for profit and power<><]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RUSSIA BANS IMPORTS OF US BEEF, POULTRY - COMMENT SENT TO SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: C. Forster
    To: "Senator Debbie Stabenow" <senator@stabenow.senate.gov>
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:47 PM
    Subject: Russia Bans imports of us beef,poultry

    From Charlie Forster [mailing address removed for privacy]  Jones Michigan 49061

    DEFACTO Senator Stabenow,  
    I seen the article in my local farm paper about Russia Banning beef and poultry imports due to Ractopamine additive. The Russians are well within their rights to ban
    not only due to the Ractopamine but also all the GMO grains these animals have digested in their lives. They should also be banned in The United States. You may
    disagree due to your political ties but when  you put this feed out and the mice and rats don't eat it, you know something is wrong, And what about all the chemicals
    they are incorporating in the seeds? This just has to be poisoning our and other people. Oh well just go down and enjoy a RoundUp ready steak for supper and rinse
    it down with some RoundUp ready Soy Milk.  Charlie

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RERE GUN LAWS -  Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: Bonnie
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: rere gun laws

Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20

    "Haynes, a convicted felon, was convicted of unlawful possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun.   He argued that for a convicted felon to register a gun
    was effectively an announcement to the government that he was breaking the law and that registration violated his Fifth Amendment protection against self-
    incrimination.   The court, by an 8 – 1 margin, agreed, concluding: “We hold that a proper claim of the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination provides a
    full defense to prosecutions either for failure to register a firearm…or for possession of an unregistered firearm.” (Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000,
    page 20)  So, when these gun registration schemes are announced, be aware that only lawful gun-owners are required to register their firearms.  Unlawful owners
    are exempted from registration laws due to their constitutional protection against self-incrimination."

I think this goes back to when they started the barrel and stock length rules.shot gun 18 and 8 rifle 16 and 8. This was done to discourage the gangsters short 12 ga pistol
etc. BTW one that is cut at the pistol grip and for end will have a bad muzzle jump while one that is just legal length will do a fine job  and handle fast enough.
~submitted by Gray Beard

February 28, 2013  ONE OF THE PEOPLE SPEAKING OUT - REPLY TO PHIL CAVANAGH
From: Melissa
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:54 PM
To: Bonnie
Subject: Re: FW: info

I have received a response from one of the reps and I have written him back.
Phil Cavanagh,

"there are a number of bills that deal with various aspects of firearm regulation including weapon free zones".  Do you realize that there is a law called the Dick Act of
1903, which states that there is no law that shall take away the second amendment.  Are all of you, as representatives confused about who put you in office and why?  
There should be absolutely NO LAWS that impede or take away the second amendment, and that includes assault rifles. Where is your authority?  The people did not give
you that power. "While I support the 2nd amendment and all rights guaranteed by the Constitution, I believe that weapons capable of such mass destruction can be
regulated without impinging upon our Constitutional rights."  In this statement I hear a lot of  "I support, and I believe. There are a lot of I's in your answer, sir.  Again,
your opinion is not the reason that you are in the position that you are in and why "WE THE PEOPLE" are paying your huge salary as many are out of work and can barely
feed their children.  OUR OPINION IS THE ONLY OPINION THAT SHOULD SHINE THROUGH WHEN A BILL OR A DISCUSSION COMES UP IN THE STATE
CONGRESS!!  Again, you are confused as to the duty of your stay in office which is only because others put you there.  We continue to get these type of letters back
from representatives that state thank you for your opinion and I will try to keep it in mind when "I" make a decision.  Please keep this in mind that "WE THE PEOPLE"
have sat back and allowed unchecked power to grow like a cancer but now we are growing in numbers and there will be a major house cleaning of representatives that
have THEIR OWN OPINION and AGENDA'S, which are controlled by lobbyists.  No more!  

Also, where is my letter or statement from you about the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and a so called, "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE" in the state of
Michigan.  "WE THE PEOPLE" did not vote on this POWER GRAB and most people do not even understand or know that it exists.  This information has gone viral and it
will catch on.  I am expecting an explanation as to why this has come to fruition and what you sir, Phil Cavanagh have done to stop DHS whom has no authority
whatsoever, via the tenth amendment.  If this is allowed to happen what will you be doing for an occupation and to feed your children?  I will be looking forward to your
detailed explanation to these questions.  I have posted all letters, including mine from Representatives on the internet for "WE THE PEOPLE" to view.   

Sincerely,
Melissa
Concerned Citizen of the state of Michigan and "WE THE PEOPLE"  -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE  PURSUANT TO  UCC 1-308
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FEED A FAMILY OF FOUR FOR ONE YEAR FOR LESS THAN $300
This plan is THE fastest, cheapest and easiest way to start a food storage program.  You are done in a weekend. AND there are no hassles with rotating.  Pack it and
forget.  It’s space efficient – everything is consolidated into a few 5-gallon buckets.  You’ll sleep content in knowing that you have a one-year food supply on hand for
your family should you ever need.
READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard

[My thought: This could be used for low income families on a fixed income to stretch their ability to feed their family, especially if cuts to food stamps take place. As a
Naturopathy doctor I live by this rule, " I eat to survive, I don't survive to eat".<><]

February 26, 2013  2ND Amendment Preservation Act Email Conversation between Mr. Forster and Rep. Mike Shirkey, District 65  PDF
As with most email dialogues that are forwarded, one must scroll down, then scroll back up while reading for the correct order of the conversation.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I filled out a web form for Congressman Benishek and Representative Kivela for District 1 on both issues. I only received a thank you from Rep.Kivela but here is the read
back from Congressman Benishek    
2nd Amendment    Constitution Free Notice
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LIST OF DEFACTO REPRESENTATIVES EMAIL CONTACT ADDRESSES   DOC
All the names and email addresses are listed in the Doc above.  Just copy and paste your District Representative.  A big "thank you" to Cathy for the time spent gathering all
the names and addresses.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ron Paul: “When They Came For The Raw Milk Drinkers…”
——————————
February 25, 2013 The Doc Swat Team Milk Raid—While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be disarmed: ——
Federal Agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked, threats to liberty. Too often
Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and the federal bureaucracy.
For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s founder, 65-year old
James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese to willing customers – in a state where
raw milk is legal!  You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit!
www.silverdoctors.com/ron-paul-when-they-came-for-the-raw-milk-drinkers/#more-22176
From what I've read they took the farms inventory of thousands of dollars and the farm is now filing for bankruptcy– Where else can a thing like this happen– besides a
free country like America —-
~submitted by Edge—

[My thought: This is the tyranny that is going on daily across our country and the people cower away and allow innocent hard-working people to lose all they have because
they are competition for the mega corporations. These are the real criminals and I agree with Ron Paul, if anyone should be disarmed it is these Federal Agencies that are
terrorizing innocent Americans that are just trying to survive. We all need to revisit our Declaration of Independence I think <><]

February 25, 2013      RUGER HAS MADE IT SIMPLE
-----Original Message-----
From: isaiah
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:17 AM
To: XXXXX
Subject: Re: Ruger has made it simple

    THE FIRST LINE MAKES YOU DECLARE YOU ARE A GUN OWNER!!    OUR 2and Amendment PRESERVATION ACT [see below] DOES NOT
    PUT YOU ON A GUN OWNERS LIST!!!! You do it yourself!! We email and snail mailed both the Notice and the Preservation act. When you do it your self
    it has more meaning than those mass mailings and  they don't even look at them!
    We hope every one will take the time to snail mail three envelopes for each issue and also email. Time is short!!
    I think Ruger is one of those company's bought out by George Soros under one of his Illuminati fence names AND ONE CAN ONLY WONDER WHERE
    HIS NAME WENT!
    Charlie
    On 02/25/2013 01:18 AM, XXXXX wrote:
    >   Ruger has made it simple!
    > Go to the link and follow the simple prompts.
    >
    > http://www.ruger.com/micros/advocacy/takeAction.html
    >
    > Ruger has made it easy for you to contact your Local and National Representatives. It only takes about 2 minutes and sends a pro-2nd Amendment email to
    everyone from the president down to your local state reps.
    `submitted by Gray Beard
[My note:  Please everyone, print or copy and paste the Notice and the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act and send them to your District Representatives, Senators, and
Governor, but at least your Representatives, and send them separately so as not to confuse the two very serious issues. Beware of BIG CORPORATIONS, and it is best to
independently as THE PEOPLE to give Congress a DIRECTIVE first hand, not through one of THEIR SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS.  Our Constitutional Rights do not
come from CORPORATE POLICIES. If we play their game it is feeding the corporate beast, as THE PEOPLE, lets stop doing this and let our unalienable rights be the
foundation we stand on and demand they honor their oaths or step down from their "governance" of the people..  This is how we restore our de jure republic. Link for
defacto state citizen guide above for your convenience. <><]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Smart Meters" & EMR: The Health Crisis Of Our Time - Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt  VIDEO   
I sent this to our city manager, Senator Vincent Gregory and Vicki Barnett.  I will, time willing, send to all the representatives. ~submitted by Cathy C

[My note: If you are pregnant, planning to have children, know someone that is, or already have children it would behoove you to watch the above video for the sake of
your child's health as well as your own. Please become proactive in managing your own health and that of your children. Follow Cathy's lead and do the same, send this
information to your representatives.  They need to hear from the people that we are NOT going to quietly go along with this destruction created by big corporations for
profit <><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+
National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority -(NSEA) WISHES TO ALIGN WITH International Common Law Court of Justice -(ITCCS)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Murphy
Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Subject: NSEA wishes to aline with ITCCS
To: hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com
3 ATTACHMENTS:  
Notice to Clerk of District Court 2-8013- Full Notice   Clean Water Contingency Program 2012     Sewer Rats  

Dear Secretariat,

Please convey to Kevin Annett our wish for the National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority’s (“NSEA”) to align with ITCCS so as to convene our common law
courts in alignment with and under the same name of International Common Law Court of Justice.  We at NSEA have developed a notice and contract document
(attached) to serve to all the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTs in America.  Currently, grand jury quorums of a pool of twenty-three (23) are being formed in every
State by our people in every State.  A tribunal of three justices will be selected from the pool [of non-U.S. citizens] to hear any case regarding crimes against humanity and
genocide.

We will be bringing actions against public servants (employees of private corporations impersonating public servants) who are complicit with the crimes of genocide being
perpetrated upon the American people by knowingly contributing to the poisoning of the people’s drinking water resources in violation of the Public Law 92-500 Clean
Water Act.  The UNITED STATES “UNLAWFUL” WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, owned by the Vatican and dba the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and STATE
governments, has been operating in violation of the Clean Water Act now for over 40 years.  It is the one crime they are all guilty of….and it is a “strict liability” statute
that attached criminal penalties.  We have already completed an investigative report on Janet Napolitano, who was found to have a slush fund in the Vatican Bank as the
result of your efforts, for extorting of the people of Lake Havasu City of $1.8 Billion dollars when she was Attorney General and Governor of Arizona.  She is going to be
one of the first…along with Obama and company.  I also wish to confirm if the USEPA Administrator Lisa Jackson had a slush fund in the Vatican Bank.

The so-called UNITED STATES [INC.] government impersonators are actually doing business as a Vatican owned, co-corporation of the London municipal wastewater
management utility since 1871, also known as the UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY that has been unlawfully operating since July 1, 1973.  Over 35,000
people each month (just in America, NOT including Canada) are dying from just cancer due to toxic/acidic drinking water conditions as a result of this grave
omission/refusal of these Vatican Criminal Genocidests to administer federal health code, the at-source containment and control required by the congressionally mandated
regulations of the Clean Water Act, and that is JUST the beginning.

Since 40% of all municipal revenue nationally was the result to wastewater management revenues, Nixon, a member of the bar…who is in fact the ones put in power to
protect the Vatican/Crown/City of London/IMF investments, specifically the largest industry in the world, the $500 Billion dollar a year UNITED STATES WASTEWATER
INDUSTRY, put the BAR in charge of all “courts,” in actuality… mere “administrative agencies” having ZERO judicial authority.  The people NEVER gave judicial powers
to “private corporations.”  The U.S. courts, from the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS, the STATE SUPERIOR COURTS
and MUNICIPAL COURTS are the “gate keepers” charged to “get rid of” any action that would threaten their criminal UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY
racketeering influenced corrupt organization (“R.I.C.O.”) run enterprise.

The BAR is charged with protecting and maintaining the unlawful wastewater management practice of poisoning the people feeding their other primary criminal enterprises,
i.e. insurance, health care and pharmaceutical, all to create unjust enrichments and ill-gotten gains.   If they had complied with the Clean Water Act of 1972 [spurred by
JFK], they would have been out of business by 1985, the year all public sewers were to be outlawed as the primary national goal of the United States Congress as defined
in the Clean Water Act.

Further, as a member of the “wastewater industry” since 1972, I am a federal witnesses to their unlawful practice of knowingly unlawfully discharging 65 plus known
toxic pollutants/hazardous substances associated with domestic sewage, listed on the USEPA Toxic Pollutant List, uncontained and uncontrolled (as mandated by the Clean
Water Act), at every onshore facility in north America, including Canada, such to be operating in compliance with the requirements of the congressionally mandated
standards of performance and pretreatment requirements of the Clean Water Act.  However, only approximately 20 onshore facilities are containing and controlling these
poisons.  This mission of genocide, premeditated murder upon the people of America and Canada, is controlled by the Vatican “sewer rats.”  They have knowingly, with
intent to harm, converted every home, i.e. or building having a toilet, into a “chemical and biological weapon of mass destruction,” unlawfully discharging poisons by
exfiltration and direct discharge into our nations drinking water resources.  Now, you have exposed them to be what we have been claiming.

We have already conveyed to the public in several documentations over the past two years (see attached) the enemy is the Vatican, International Monetary Fund, City of
London, the Crown, and the Guild of London from which comes all members of the BAR who are controlling America right now, killing, stealing and destroying “us.”

What you have recently done is awesome!  Thank you!

We at NSEA.US wish to support and expand the mission of ITCCS into the true united states for America.  In order to do that, we wish to provide the name of our court
in Section 3.4 of the “notice-contract” (attached) which will be sent to the district courts, to be defined as: The International Court of Record of Justice.  NSEA has
already executed a joint powers agreement with the 11th tribe of the Cherokee Republic and have been adopted as an Elder advisor to the tribe.

Accordingly, “International” is also the proper identification of venue for our court of record.  We wish to align with you and your program and assist in your pursuit of
justice.  We could implement the “North America Reclamator Program.”  The program would restore government, clean water, good health and economic stability
throughout North America.  Additionally, our “New Water Source Utility” has been approved to receive “debt forgiven funds” of up to $180 Billion available to implement
technology that transforms raw sewage into pure potable healthy water and generates enough electricity to sustain a home.  However, we must first get these government
imposters out of our way.  This is why the people must be able to convene their common law courts.

We would also hope that the alignment of NSEA and ITCCS could also bring a certain level of benefit to your efforts.  For us, we see the relationship to be very beneficial
to both parties and in the interest of mankind at large.  For this reason, we wish to have your blessings on our using the name of the court, International Common Law
Court of Record.

Please contact me pursuant to the information below to discuss further.

Keep up the good work and may God bless you,

Tom Murphy
Private Attorney-General
National Standards Enforcement Authority
“an in capita sovereign body authority of the people”
http://www.nsea.us/
http://www.reclamator.com/
775-848-8800
~submitted by Cathy C

February 24, 2013  STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT - MICHIGAN CONGRESS COPIED
From: isaiah
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Bonnie Frownfelter
Cc: Governor Rick Snyder; Senator John Proos; State Rep Adam Zemke; State Rep Al Pscholka; State Rep Alberta Tinsley - Talabi; State Rep Amanda Price; State Rep
Andrea LaFontaine; State Rep Andrew Kandrevas; State Rep Andy Schor; State Rep Anthony Forlini; State Rep Aric Nesbitt; State Rep Ben Glardon; State Rep Bill Lavoy;
State Rep Bill Rogers; State Rep Bob Genetski; State Rep Brad Jacobsen; State Rep Brandon Dillon; State Rep Brian Banks; State Rep Bruce Rendon; State Rep Charles
Brunner; State Rep Charles Smiley; State Rep Cindy Denby; State Rep Collene Lamonte; State Rep Dale Zorn; State Rep Dan Lauwers; State Rep Dave Pagel; State Rep
David Knezek; State Rep David Nathan; State Rep David Rutledge; State Rep Dian Slavens; State Rep Douglas Geiss; State Rep Earl Poleski; State Rep Ed McBroom; State
Rep Eileen Kowall; State Rep Ellen Lipton; State Rep Frank Foster; State Rep Fred Durhal; State Rep Gail Haines; State Rep George Darany; State Rep Greg MacMaster;
State Rep Gretchen Driskell; State Rep Harold Haugh; State Rep Harvey Santana; State Rep Henry Yanez; State Rep Hugh Crawford; State Rep Jase Bolger; State Rep Jeff
Farrington; State Rep Jeff Irwin; State Rep Jim Ananich; State Rep Jim Stamas; State Rep Jim Townsend; State Rep Joel Johnson; State Rep John Kivela; State Rep John
Olumba; State Rep John Walsh; State Rep Jon Bumstead; State Rep Jon Switalski; State Rep Joseph Graves; State Rep Joseph Haveman; State Rep Kate Segal; State Rep
Ken Goike; State Rep Ken Yonker; State Rep Kenneth Kurtz; State Rep Kevin; State Rep Kevin Daley; State Rep Klint Kesto; State Rep Kurt Heise; State Rep Lisa Lyons;
State Rep Marcia Hover Wright; State Rep Margaret O'Brien; State Rep Marilyn Lane; State Rep Martin Howrylak; State Rep Matt Lori; State Rep Mike Callton; State Rep
Mike McCready; State Rep Mike Shirkey; State Rep Nancy Jenkins
Subject: Re: NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT
Dear Michigan elected official,
adopt the below document as soon as possible
Thank you
Charlie Forster
Jones MI
49061


    STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation ACT.” To prevent
    federal infringement on the right to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
    WE The People of Michigan ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1: We The People OF Michigan find that:
    A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the
    right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
    B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment

    SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
    A. We The People OF Michigan declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd Amendment to
    the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as given by the
    Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this State,and shall not be recognized by any county, are specifically rejected by that county,
    and shall be
    considered null and void and of no effect in this county.

    B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of each County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws, orders,
    rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    SECTION 3 This Second Amendment Right to bear arms applies to ALL arms and ammunition for said arms. The citizenry per the second amendment is
    given the right to bear all weapons made available to the military, and ammunition to said weapons is to be readily available, this cannot be infringed upon. ''If
    the Government is allowed to have it the people (the employers) may have it."
    Current Michigan Constitution
    § 6 Bearing of arms. Sec. 6. Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

    § 4 Militia.
    Sec. 4. The militia shall be organized, equipped and disciplined as provided by law. History: Const. 1963, Art. III, § 4, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964.Former constitution:
    See Const. 1908, Art. XV, §§ 1-3.

      Electors,
      Charlie Forster       &          Bonnie Frownfelter
      Jones Mi 49061                  Munising, MI 49862
                                  &
       WE THE PEOPLE  OF THE STATE OF Michigan

[My note: Please copy and paste the above ACT and present it to your townships and counties councils/commissioners to create an Ordinance to adopt this Act for the
protection of the peoples rights, then give notice to the county sheriff so he is informed and can enforce the ordinance. This is being sent to all the above by USPS.<><]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
MICHIGAN SEAT BELT LAW -TICKET

----- Original Message -----
From: Donald F
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:41 AM
Subject: Seat belt ticket

Well it happened. The ticket that I said if I ever got, I would be really angry. This is the most Un-Constitutional nonsense ever!
Imagine a cop having nothing better to do than peak through your vehicle windows and see if you have your seat belt on! Tell me WE are not just a resource to milk for
money?! This fits under the "unreasonable search and seizure" category doesn't it? A cop can say, "It didn't look like you had your seat belt on, so what else is going on
today?" That's bull crap!!! We are not free, why do we keep deluding ourselves?
So, I'm driving through the little town of Mancelona like I do 3 times a week for the last 10 years. Barney Fife is sitting at a gas station facing the highway, waves to a
"buddy" heading north, turns to look my way as I was passing at just the perfect time, I was heading south, and whips out behind me. You know that feeling you get when
you know for sure it's you they are coming for. Another guy was right on my tail with a full size pick-up so the LEO couldn't see me right away from the time he pulled
out, so I had pulled my belt on knowing that was the only reason he could pull me over. I thought, "there ya go ya pot licker, got it on now". He lights em up, I pull over
and he says, "I'm enforcing the seat belt law today and you have to have it on before I see you didn't, license and registration" or something like that. I told him "I have a
CPL", he says "OK". I give him "my papers" he heads back to "generate some revenue" with his pen.
When he comes back to my window I thought I'd share my feelings with him, I said, "When you became a "Peace Officer" (look up the difference between that and a
LEO if you don't know) did you ever think you would be nothing more than a revenue generator?" His eyes bugged out and he got real nervous, he realized he wasn't
talking to a sheep. He said, "Our department only gets $3 per seat belt fine" I said, "I don't care, do you know there are real criminals around here, Meth Labs, drug dealers,
and here you are wasting your time with me, a tax paying, law abiding Citizen, why don't you go and catch some real bad guys!?" Somewhere in my ranting  I told him
that I "wear my seat belt religiously and I would see him in court" because I had it on, I figured it's his word against mine. He wanted to tell me a story about safety and try
to be my "buddy" and I said, "Just give me the ticket, I don't need to listen to your preaching". Then he got that shocked look again and with shaking hands pointed at the
ticket to explain what I needed to do, about calling this number and marking the boxes, you know.
I felt pretty good about enlightening him about "bull crap laws" and how one Citizen anyway, ain't gonna take it. Now I have to go and fight this crap in court, anyone have
any experience at this and want to give me some advice?
If WE as a people don't get mad as hell and fight this crap WE are going to be corralled into a pen and charged with "chewing gum in bondage"!
If you still don't "get it", as I have a diverse audience here and you think "what's the big deal Don, pay the ticket and move on". Please tell me that, so I can remove you
from my mailing list, there really is no hope for you and you really should just go get your "chip" now and save the Powers that Be alot of hassle.
Just thought you might like to enjoy a story that happened "close to home". Taking any advice offered. Your friend, Don    

]My note: If anyone has any suggestions for Don to assist him in court please contact me and I will get you in touch with him.  Let's help one another folks to restore our
de jure republic of, by, and for the people. The  POLICE STATE,  called Michigan needs to be dismantled. <><]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bulletin Board -NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS -PUBLICATION IN FREE PRESS
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
•       
 NOTICE
NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this notice to all branches of
Congress and local government that have sworn an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution. This
notice is to let all members of congress and local government know you are very close, if not already, in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your
employment by the people of Michigan. It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional
decree. HLS does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.Entire notice at:www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/notice.html
From Detroit Free Press & The Detroit News on 2013-02-24
http://www.michigan.com/classifieds/#420/70  [Runs for seven days in print and online

February 21, 2013  NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE DEFACTO MICHIGAN CONGRESS AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this NOTICE to all branches of Congress and local government that have sworn
an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution. This notice is to let all members of
congress and local government know you are  very close, if not already in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your employment by the
people of Michigan.  

It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as  acquiescence  to this repugnant UN-constitutional decree. Homeland Security
(HLS) does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.   Read complete
NOTICE

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - WHAT CASS COUNTY, MICHIGAN IS DOING - A model for others to implement

Original message
From: isaiah
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:39 AM
To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
Cc: xxxxx xxxxxx
Subject: LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE

xxxxxx,
FYI this is the one from  Indiana
Make ours very similar!
IF the Fed wants to cut grants or sharing funds we can cut out all their income!!
xxxxx     
http://blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2013/01/franklin-county-indiana-passes-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance/
http://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/franklin-county-commissioners-sign-2nd-amendment-preservation-ordinance-into-law

Here is the language of the ordinance:

LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the right to keep and bear
arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN
COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The Franklin County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well regulated
militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or
regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
A. The Franklin County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as given by the Founders and
Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county, are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be considered null
and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws, orders, rules, or
regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act takes effect upon approval by the
Franklin County Board of Commissioners
------------------------
copy and paste the following to an email and send to county council members or commissioners in your township or county ------------

    LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - _______________________________County, Michigan.
    An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the right
    to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF
    COMMISSIONERS OF __________________ COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1: The _______________________ County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United
    States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall
    not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment

     SECTION 2: PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS
    A. The ________________County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in
    violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true
    meaning and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county,
    are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
    B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws,
    orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act
    takes effect upon approval by the _____________________County Board of Commissioners.  DOC   PDF

~submitted by Gray Beard

[My note:  this is what everyone in  Michigan should start working on in their townships and counties, (change county to township in above form, and commissioners to
the terminology used in your area if different).  People really need to start showing up to the council (commissioners) meetings in their township and counties.  As you
meet people at these meetings form jural assemblies of the people to transition the “corporate commissioners” into a de jure republic voice of, by, and for the people instead
of the machine it now is to further the corporate/socialist/communist/democratic/progressive/collectivist control agenda.<><]

February 20, 2013  RESOLUTION VS. ORDINANCE - Gilberton, PA   WHY CAN'T WE DO THIS IN MICHIGAN?
From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: resolution VS Ordinance
The paper was calling it a Resolution but the actual wording is Ordnance.   The thing to remember is that a resolution has no force of law. The ordnance will give the twp
the opportunity to instruct the county sheriff to remove the Feds.  See if you can get an ordnance adopted in your area.  Mine is looking at it
Isaiah
-----------------------------------------------------
Resolution vs. Ordinance
Gilberton, PA is a small borough in Schuylkill County, with a population of about 840, but the little community took a big stand Thursday night.  “It`s about time that the
little guy stands up to the government and says we don`t want any change. This is the purpose of this. We want to continue to have our Second Amendment rights, the
right to bear arms and the right to choose,” said Mayor Mary Lou Hannon of Gilberton.

Borough council members unanimously passed a resolution in support of the Second Amendment at a packed council meeting. The resolution is also in opposition to any
local, state or federal regulations of firearms.

The resolution was the borough police chief’s idea and supported by dozens of folks who packed into the council meeting room, who applauded when council members
approved it.
READ MORE
~submitted by Gray Beard

February 19, 2013    MCMILLIN BILL SEEKS TO AVERT FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF SCHOOL CURRICULUM -District 45, Rochester Hills

State Rep. Tom McMillin today introduced legislation that prevents the federal government from imposing federal standards, curriculum and testing on local schools, all of
which constitute unfunded - and mostly undefined - mandates.

House Bill 4276  removes the state from participation in the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which McMillin said is a federal attempt to take decision-making
abilities from state and local school officials.

"We are expected to blindly accept these standards from the federal government, which thinks it knows what Michigan schoolchildren need in terms of curriculum better
than we do," said McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. "This is an obvious overreach by the federal government into our classrooms and we should join the other states that have
opted out of the initiative.
The federal government should not dictate what is taught in every classroom in the nation, especially in Michigan." READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C

[My thought:  This is a good start for Michigan to start enacting the Tenth Amendment, but it needs to be enacted across the board for all unconstitutional over-stepping
powers by the Federal Corporation government and not just the ones that step on certain toes. The local communities should take back the control of their schools and
curriculum from the state. <><]

February 18, 2013  READ THE 1963 CONSTITUTION - WHICH ISN'T A CONSTITUTION AT ALL- BUT A CORPORATE CONTRACT

I suggest everyone take a look at the operating Constitution of Michigan, which is the 1963 Version, the later rulings are included with reference at the bottom of each
section. Two points of interest,  first the watered down generic oath of office, Article XI reads:

    Sec. 1. Oath of Public Officers.  "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the constitution of this state,
    and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of ________________________ according to the best of my ability."

They will "support", what happened to protect, defend, or uphold the Constitution?  Absolutely no accountability with such an ambiguous word as "support."  but given the
fact that this is clearly a Corporate Contract and not a Constitution of, by, and for the people of Michigan it really is not surprising.  Second point of interest is found in
Article IX:

    Sec. 1. Taxes for state expenses. The Legislature shall impose taxes sufficient with other resources to pay the expenses of state government.
    Sec. 2. Power of taxation, relinquishment.  The power of taxation shall never be surrendered, suspended or contracted away.

Notice how generic their oath of office for the people is, but how absolutely clear the intent of securing our financial resources for their existence is. No ambiguity there   
How many people in Michigan have even read this Corporate Contract, or recognize it as such.

No wonder Michigan was picked to become a "pilot police state", and perhaps that is the very reason the first implementation of fluoride into drinking water was
introduced in Grand Rapids first, before it went throughout the state and on to other states.  Now Michigan is a "
Constitution Free Zone" by decree from Homeland
Security, and what legislation has been put in place by our Michigan Congress to "support" the Constitutional Fourth Amendment, since they have the "support" of the
Tenth Amendment to do so. They are paid to represent the people of Michigan and to "SUPPORT" the Constitution, so it is their duty to create Legislation to "Support" the
Constitutional Rights of the people, that is their job.  We should not have to lobby for such protection, not when it comes to the Bill of Rights.  The people of Michigan are
already so oppressed due to the POLICE STATE statues, codes and laws, not to mention the over-regulating of everything for so long that the duty of the Michigan
Congress should be to spend time nullifying these repugnant laws for the people, as the representatives of the people.

The Tenth Amendment is all the authority Congress needs to nullify repugnant unconstitutional laws coming out of DC, and if they are not going to do this when it is
THEIR JOB and DUTY to do so, then perhaps a RECALL is in order.

I suggest the people read the three constitution below and contrast the difference, the first is the operating 1963 used by the defacto corporate congress of Michigan, the
second is the original 1835 Constitution, and the third is the 1835 Revised, Ratified Constitution for the De Jure Republic for Michigan.
1963 Constitution operating today by defacto Michigan Congress
1835 First Constitution for Michigan, obtaining statehood
1835 Original Constitution Revised and Ratified for the De Jure Republic for Michigan (Of course it is only provisional)
Citizen Guide to Defacto State Government - This is the current guide for the citizens of Michigan from the defacto Michigan Congress

When I put together the NOTICE to the members of Congress in Michigan, which I'm working on now, it needs to be sent out by you and others in your area as well, and
this can be by email.  I will be sending the notice  to all members via email and USPS mail, as well as a portion will be published but for the sake of expense readers will
than be directed to a web page set-up for it for more information.  This is a group effort that all the people need to let their representatives know what is expected from
them as "paid" representatives for the people.  I will send out information and try to make it as easy as possible to take action.  The only way we are going to be able to
transition our de jure republic of, by, and for the people back into existence to protect our
"Immunities" from an over-stepping tyrannical defacto Federal Government,
and as it would appear, the defacto state level as well  is to implement them at our township level by building jural assemblies of the people, and expand out from there.  
That is where, we the people have the greatest power.<><

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FACT SHEET ON U.S. "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE"

Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100 miles of the US
land and coastal borders. The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just about the border: This "
Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas.  (Are You Living In A Constitution Free Zone? See the interactive map >>)
We urge you to call on Congress to hold hearings on and pass legislation to end these egregious violations of Americans' civil rights.
FACT SHEET

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Federal Reserve audit exposes major securities fraud and the embezzlement of $16 trillion

An audit of the Federal Reserve has revealed that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly doled out more than $16 trillion in zero interest loans to some of the largest
financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world.  The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress also determined that the Fed acted
illegally.  In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to its employees and private contractors so they could keep investments in the same
financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans.  The report is evidence that reveals major securities fraud in the embezzlement of $16 trillion by the
Federal Reserve.
$16 trillion is 10 times more than what the U.S. Congress authorized and Bush ($700 billion) and Obama ( $787 billion) signed off on.  The Federal Reserve was only
authorized by Congress to use $1.487 trillion in federal tax dollars in bailouts.  The Federal Reserve embezzled another $14.5 trillion.
The Congressional report determined that the Fed secretly hide most of the embezzled money into their own banks.  The rest the Fed unilaterally transferred trillions of
dollars to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland.  Foreign banks and corporations which the Federal Reserve bankers had a personal financial
interest or stake in.
ARTICLE

February 17, 2013  IS THERE ANYONE HAVING TROUBLES WITH YOUR HOMEOWNERS, OR COUNTRY ESTATE INSURANCE?
    From: isaiah
    To: Bonnie
    Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:55 PM
    Subject: Re: Insurance

    A thought for you,  can you put a question on one of the web pages and see if others are having troubles  with their ins co?
    Is there anyone out there having troubles with your homeowners or country estate insurance ?
    if so reply here?  EMAIL

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You Can't Ban Evil

This young lady hits the nail on the head, telling a side of the gun control issue that unfortunately most have either never thought about or pretend to be ignorant as to the
real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment!  (You know for a fact that the self-serving politicians in Washington know the intent and purpose of the 2nd Amendment but
want to exercise their power and control over us and are afraid their corrupt regime might be overthrown some day!) Take a couple minutes to listen to what a very bright
young black woman has learned...
LISTEN

February 15, 2013  Oath Keepers » Stewart Rhodes Speaks at Albany New York Gun Rights Rally on February 12

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes gave a fiery speech to approximately 3,000 New York gun owners, urging them to refuse to comply to the “SAFE Act,” to refuse
to disarm, to nullify at every level. He also urged them to make sure their county was a “Molon Labe” county, asking them “is your county a ‘come and take it’ county, or
is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!” He told them to make sure all the gun owners and veterans in their county are ready to stand up, and
will commit to refuse to comply, and then go to the sheriff and the police chief of their town and put them on notice that they are expected to choose sides. He told the
crowd to use April 19, 2013, the upcoming anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord, in 1775, as the deadline for their sheriff, police chiefs [and all other oath
sworn public servants] to choose sides — “are they patriots, or are they redcoats?” at the rally Oath Keepers had the effigies of Cuomo, Schumer, Bloomberg, and other
oath breaking traitors dressed up in red coats, with signs hanging around their necks saying “Oath Breaker,” “Red Coat” and “Traitor”
Then retired New York State Police (Highway Patrol) officer John Wallace, a member of Oath Keepers, led thousands of New Yorkers in an oath renewal/oath taking
ceremony, pledging to defend the Constitution and to not disarm  
WATCH

[My thought:  It is my hope there can be peaceful resolution, that all the newly sworn oath keepers will take this oath back to their communities to help more people to
STAND UP and claim what is already ours,and always has been, but to do so with a calm, firm RESOLVE using their VOICE to kick the progressives out of their
communities and reinstate new laws of, by, and for the people in accordance with the Constitution - Bill of Rights, standing on first our God given Rights, next our
Declaration of Independence given to us by our very wise forefathers. We do NOT ACQUIESCE, and all we have to do is TELL THEM<><]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ONE EASY LESSON

----- Forwarded Message ----
Sent: Thu, February 14, 2013 11:20:09 AM
Subject: One Easy Lesson
Greetings and Salutations on this Happy Valentine's Day,

We all have busy/full lives.  If you have not taken the time to become familiar with UN Agenda 21/Sustainability/Place Making/Smart Growth/Walking Community, etc.,
you Need to do so.  Go to the site at the very bottom.

I have previously sent out info regarding this topic, made two presentations to my local Boyne City Commissioners, and more.  I just came upon this site and found it
concise as well as an excellent source for additional related info.  There is so much information out there, but requires some digging/time.

The common rebuttal by those that are knowingly or unknowingly involved is that it is partisan, we just use the same terms, fear mongering by the Tea Party, a conspiracy
theory, the UN has no control over us, etc.

Many who are strongly into conservation and the environment are finding they have been infiltrated and being used by this agenda.  Many groups and ideas initially had
good intentions which were introduced and talked about with very nice community friendly verbiage, but are really being manipulated by ICLEI and others often through
acquiring grants only after becoming a member.   Grant writing, if you have not noticed, has become a new art form.   

Follow the money, as some of it comes from our tax dollars through the EPA and other agencies in our government.  Did they need Congressional Approval?   Other
money comes from foundations like the Kellogg Foundation, Tides Foundation, and other huge money pots.  Just research the sources of their funding.

This is very organized, tenacious, well funded and wears Many Masks.  Behind the Green Mask is a book written by Rosa Koire whose web site www.
democratsagainstunagenda21.com    is found on the site at the bottom.

Our potus plans much more for his  (O for A)  
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Organizing_for_America. You heard or heard about his plans for the future on many topics in his S of the U.   One is the
Environment (made into the new religion).  He plans on changes even if Congress does not comply.....yet more Exec. Orders.  People will be entering our communities or
people already there using the avenues already in place to start small and grow.  Just like the population, where do you begin to indoctrinate, with the easiest and the
youngest of us, our children.  Make sure you know what your children/grandchildren are learning in school, reading, and watching on TV (now there is another interesting
topic).  So this idea has and is going to get stronger, so be very aware of what is going on in your communities, counties, state regions, states, etc.  When you can and
need to...Speak Up.  Being Forewarned is Forearmed    Nothing worse than being Blindsided.   This is only one of many issues.  Scary!
•        one easy lesson - What Is Agenda 21
whatisagenda21.net/agenda21.htm
All part of Agenda 21 policy. Economic Prosperity? Public Private Partnerships (PPP). ... ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, ...
Be Well, God Bless You and Yours,  and  God Bless America          Carole
Carpe Diem,   

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ACQUIESCE
    1828 Definition ACQUIESCE, v.i. acquiess'. [L. acquiesco, of ad and quiesco, to be quiet; quies, rest.]

    1. To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent; usually implying previous opposition, uneasiness, or dislike, but
    ultimate compliance, or submission; as, to acquiesce in the dispensations of providence.

    2. To assent to, upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; that is, to rest satisfied of its correctness, or propriety.

    Acquiesced in, in a passive sense, complied with; submitted to, without opposition; as, a measure has been acquiesced in.1913 DefinitionAcquiesce
    (acquiesce)
    v. i. ((?))
    Ac`qui*esce"
    [imp. *** p. p. Acquiesced (&?]); p. pr. *** vb. n. Acquiescing (&?])] [L. acquiescere; ad + quiescere to be quiet, fr. quies rest: cf. F. acquiescer. See  

    1.To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent (usually implying previous opposition or discontent); to accept or
    consent by silence or by omitting to object; -- followed by in, formerly also by with and to.
    They were compelled to acquiesce in a government which they did not regard as just.
    De Quincey.

    1.To concur upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; to assent to; usually, to concur, not heartily but so far as to forbear opposition.
    Syn. -- To submit; comply; yield; assent; agree; consent; accede; concur; conform; accept tacitly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How is the DEFACTO US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT able to do all they do?  Because
by our SILENCE, we ACQUIESCE.  It is time to speak up, and let them
KNOW we do NOT ACQUIESCE peaceably, but with firm RESOLVE.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
IMPORTANT FOR PERIMETER STATES (MICHIGAN IS ONE)   [CONSTITUTION FREE ZONES - MAP]

DHS Nullifies Fourth Amendment Rights of Millions of Americans  
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution reads:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall
issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
The Department of Homeland Security doesn’t believe in the Fourth Amendment and has recently issued statements to that affect. They are claiming that if you live within
100 miles of the international border that they have the right to search all electronic devices, including cell phones and laptop and tablet computers without probable cause
or first securing a warrant. The 100 mile distance is being referred to as the border security search zones.

This would include cities such as San Diego, Escondido, El Centro, Yuma, Tucson, Las Cruces, Carlsbad, El Paso, Brownsville, Seattle, Grand Forks, Toledo, Cleveland,
Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Montpelier to name just a few.

But wait, it gets even better! If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey or Rhode
Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state. Let’s not leave New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia out of the fun, because large areas of these states are
also being designated as search zones.

If you live anywhere in any of the designated search zones, the feds claim to have the right to invade your privacy and conduct an unconstitutional search of your private
possessions without any probable cause or warrant. If you ask me, this sounds a lot like the Gestapo under Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany, which is what I compared the
Department of Homeland Security to in an earlier article. This just helps to reinforce my claims.  
Read more:
~submitted by Cathy C

February 14, 2013    Dr. Edwin Vieira on The Militia - NewsWithViews.TV

Published on Feb 7, 2013
While most of the recent gun-control debate is focused on the individual right to bear arms could it be that we are focusing on the wrong battle? Constitutional expert Dr.
Edwin Vieira joins us to explain that not only is the "Militia" not a four-letter word, but that our Founders determined that it was "necessary for the security of a free state."
Allow Dr. Vieira to explain to you why the need for a "well-regulated militia" is the backbone to the right to keep and bear arms. You will never again look at this issue in
the same way.
LISTEN
[My note:  This is the most informative information yet concerning our Second Amendment Right, please take the time to listen]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UNALIENABLE

    1828 Definition:   UNA'LIENABLE, a. Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.
    1913 Definition Unalienable (unalienable)
    a.  Un*al"ien*a*ble (?)

    1.Inalienable; as, unalienable rights.
    Swift. -- Un*al"ien*a*bly, adv.
[Notice the change in the enunciation from 1828 to 1913, but remember the definition and what this word means]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Need your ACTION

Circulate this to as many people as you can to sign and send out ASAP
"They deserve a vote,” Obama said last night in his SOTU speech. They being the gun control activists.
Well, us anti gun control activists also deserve a vote…well congressmen Stockman, and Broun have answer the call to
KILL ALL GUN CONTROL in the House.
Click on this link to contact your congressman telling them to support corgessmen Stockman, and Broun.
capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=62408466&PROCESS=Take+Action  see if you can blast this out…..it’s going viral on FB already………..
Lots of people are talking about stuff to do, but not many are taking action…now is the time for action….

[We also deserved a vote, Mr. Obama, but we didn't get it from Harry Reid!]

~submitted by Cathy C

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ALL WARS ARE BANKERS

I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so
let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed
bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic system in which the
government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing bank
notes.
READ MORE   LISTEN     VIDEO
~submitted by Bulldog75

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WHEN TO SHOOT A COP [Please watch the video before making a snap judgement based on this title]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx  xxxxxxxx
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:44 PM
Subject: When to shoot a cop?

I'm not advocating that, but be honest, if there is never a situation where that may be needed, you might as well prepare to get on the "cattle cars" now!
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CjDHQ16MyKY
[My thought:  This was sent to me by someone and they will remain anonymous due to the fear this title invokes in many.  Is there a time to shoot a cop, lets rephrase it
with
"Is there a time to defend oneself from the criminal intent of another?"  The title is suggestive and provokes fear in many people, and the reason for this is
that people are programmed to read, "one liners" from email and text messages that they no longer read the essence of what is truly being said.  Before you along with
many others make a quick judgement based solely on the title,  please listen to the video and what it is saying.  This person is exercising his First Amendment Right.  He is
not advocating anything nor suggesting anything other then truth.  People have a RIGHT to defend themselves, whether it is with a fist, knife, gun, or ball bat, and it
doesn't matter if it is against a home invader that is a drug dealer, plumber, or that's right police officer that is corrupt and stepping outside his oath of office and breaking
the very laws taken to defend the people, but now is using that position to harm their life, or that of their families.  We...as a people need to bring back truth, honor, and
justice to our nation, and especially our state (Tenth Amendment). If we expect to be free we must accept the responsibility of "self-governance" that comes with that
freedom, and part of that responsibility is holding ALL criminals accountable, no matter their office or position.  NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN THOSE
THAT ARE IN PLACE TO UPHOLD THE LAW, AND THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEFEND THEIR LIFE AND LIBERTY AGAINST ALL THAT WOULD TRY
TO TAKE IT.
In closing I will make this statement, "violence begans violence so it should never be the first choice for resolution, but defending one's life, family, or
neighbor from
unjust lethal force is not violence defined by criminal intent, it is Self-Defense, and that is the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of a FREE PEOPLE <><]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE REAL STATE OF THE UNION FOR FEBRUARY 12

Critical condition....
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” George H. W. Bush, addressing
the General Assembly of the U.N. February 1, 1992.....he said WHAT???  
READ MORE
~submitted by Judd

February 13, 2013  RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED BY CONSTITUTION - NOT PROVIDED BY CONSTITUTION!

Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rights are protected by Constitution - not provided by Constitution!

There is an un-known number of Americans that support the truths told in this man's letter below. That un-known number is not small by any means.  This subject is
being pushed to a head by our government for reasons other than the latest school shooting.  The government is merely taking advantage of that tragedy to move forward
with plans they already had in place.  As I continue to receive thousands upon thousands of similar pieces to the one I am forwarding below, I know that our country is
headed for real problems as written below.  These Americans are not afraid to defend their rights and our current government seems hell-bent on proceeding with an
unconstitutional plan to remove their/our rights, so what do you think will ultimately happen here?  Which side of this stand-off will you end up on?  Think about where
this problem has come form originally!  Did guns get us into this Government against the people situation?  Did guns cause our elected leaders to stop doing their jobs of
protecting our nation and us?
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:

    Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan , grew up in the Indiana , Illinois , and Texas ,
    and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan . Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician in West Michigan . His research in the
    fields of crime scene investigation and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under the name "D.H. Garrison, Jr."

    Subject: If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
    Posted on January 3, 2013 by Dean Garrison
    I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own government is a
    frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel compelled to write this,
    however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens feel like they have no choice but to
    surrender their guns if the government comes for them. READ MORE
~submitted by Richard
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Guns Across America Rally - Michigan Jan 19th 2013
GAA Rally January 19th 2013 State Capitol Building, Lansing Michigan. Freedom lovers and defenders of our Constitution turned out to stand and be counted in a peaceful
and civil demonstration in support of the 2nd Amendment. You're looking at the safest place to be in Michigan on this particular afternoon... Among responsible and law
abiding gun owners! There are three parts , this is number two
 VIDEO   

Anti-Gun Rally Held in Southfield
 VIDEO
Listen carefully to the last gentleman speaking and what he has to say, very important message. This was recorded by Fox News
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE CREATOR'S "REMEDY"
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: The Creator's "remedy"
Excerpt:
    "WHY won't those in seats of power respect our documents?  Because sadly, once any new officials get into any offices (including even those who are truly well
    intended) they are quickly but secretly "made aware" of much more than our Constitutional minds previously understood regarding the power that is really calling
    the shots.  On the surface they WANT you to think that the Constitution can still save us, as this keeps us peasants from searching for and discovering the real
    layers where the criminal "slave" system really operates". READ MORE
~submitted by Dwaine

February 11, 2013  ATTENTION - Constitutional Sheriff's Leadership Call   

Anyone interested in learning how Constitutional Sheriff's Association will be attempting to unite the people in the nearly 3,100 counties in local groups. We will be
establishing websites for each county where the people will be able to educate themselves and discuss critical local issues. To restore America we need to begin by
restoring our counties. Please listen to the call live by calling (347)884-9499 or click on the following link and listen to the archived show at your convenience.
The show is schedule for Tuesday, February 11, 2013 at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time  
Leadership Call for the Constitutional Sheriff's Association
~submitted by WRAM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
GUN CONTROL AND THE CONSTITUTION
Norm:

Please share this article from the Wall Street Journal  on the Constitutionality of Gun control.

Thanks much!

Kent
Bellaire

Gun Control and the Constitution
The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First..

By DAVID B. RIVKIN JR. And ANDREW M. GROSSMAN
Could there be a better illustration of the cultural divide over firearms than the White House photograph of our skeet-shooting president? Clay pigeons are launched into the
air, but the president's smoking shotgun is level with the ground. This is not a man who is comfortable around guns. And that goes a long way toward explaining his gun-
control agenda.

Lack of informed presidential leadership aside, there is a gulf between those Americans who view guns as invaluable tools for self-defense, both against private wrongdoers
and a potentially tyrannical government, and those who regard that concept as hopelessly archaic and even subversive. For them, hunting is the only possible legitimate use
of firearms, and gun ownership should be restricted to weapons suited to that purpose.

But while the level of the policy discourse leaves much to be desired, its constitutional dimensions are even more dimly recognized, much less seriously engaged. Yet the
debate over guns, as is the case with many other contentious issues in American history, cannot be intelligently pursued without recognizing its constitutional dimensions.
The Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Heller v. District of Columbia confirmed that the Second Amendment means what it says: "the right of the people to keep and bear
arms shall not be infringed."

After Heller and its follow-on case, McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the Second Amendment rights to the states, what government cannot do is deny the individual
interest in self-defense. As a legal matter, that debate is settled.

The president and his allies seem to have missed the message, as demonstrated by his continued insistence that most of the American people, including many hunters,
support his proposed gun-control measures. Even if that claim were true, constitutionally protected rights are guarded with particular vigor precisely when public opinion
turns against them. Meanwhile, the president's continued appeals to emotion, capitalizing on a series of tragic mass shootings, also ill-fit what ought to be a serious and
dispassionate discussion.

While the courts are still sorting out Heller's implications, politicians should not assume that they have a free hand to restrict private gun ownership. Decades of case law
interpreting and applying the other provisions of the Bill of Rights show that there are hard-and-fast limits on gun control.

The general framework is straightforward and certainly well-known to those who have studied (let alone taught) constitutional law. The government cannot abridge
constitutionally protected rights simply to make a symbolic point or because it feels that something must be done. Any measure must be justified by a legitimate
government interest that is compelling or at least important. At the same time, any regulation must be "narrowly tailored" to achieve that interest.

On that basis, in a recent case the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on depictions of animal cruelty, rejecting the government's argument that it had any legitimate
interest in banning pictures and videos associated with crimes, and finding—even assuming the government's interest—that the statute swept up too much protected
speech. In this way, judicial balancing requires a careful weighing of the government's interests against the individual's, with a thumb on the scale in favor of the individual.

But you wouldn't know that from the current gun-control debate. Several states, for example, are considering gun-insurance mandates modeled after those for automobile
insurance. There is no conceivable public-safety benefit: Insurance policies cover accidents, not intentional crimes, and criminals with illegal guns will just evade the
requirement. The real purpose is to make guns less affordable for law-abiding citizens and thereby reduce private gun ownership. Identical constitutionally suspect logic
explains proposals to tax the sale of bullets at excessive rates.

The courts, however, are no more likely to allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than to undermine the First. A state cannot circumvent the right to a
free press by requiring that an unfriendly newspaper carry millions in libel insurance or pay a thousand-dollar tax on barrels of ink—the real motive, in either case, would
be transparent and the regulation struck down. How could the result be any different for the right to keep and bear arms?

The same constitutional infirmity plagues the president's plan. Consider his proposal for a new "assault weapons" ban, targeting a class of weapons distinguished by their
cosmetic features, such as a pistol grip or threaded barrel. These guns may look sinister, but they don't differ from other common weapons in any relevant respect—firing
mechanism, ammunition, magazine size—and so present no greater threat to public safety. Needless to say, the government has no legitimate interest in banning guns that
gun-controllers simply do not like and would not, themselves, care to own.

Also constitutionally suspect are restrictions on magazine size. There is no question that a limit of 10 rounds (as the president has proposed) or seven (as enacted by New
York state last month) would impair the right to self-defense. A magazine with 10 rounds may provide adequate protection against a single nighttime intruder. But it may
not: What if there are two intruders?

Further compounding the constitutional problem is the fact that the benefit of such limits is questionable. For a practiced and calm shooter, swapping magazines takes no
more than a couple of seconds. And a swap may not even be necessary if the shooter has multiple guns, as in several mass shootings in recent years.

While some limit on magazines may be constitutionally permissible, one that falls below the capabilities of guns in common usage for self-defense is probably not. The
most popular guns for self-defense take 15 or so rounds in their default configurations. Given the uncertain benefit of restricting magazine size, not to mention the tens of
millions of "high capacity" magazines in circulation, something near that number may be a constitutional minimum.

And while there is no question that procedural requirements like background checks are permissible, that does not mean that the government may place an undue burden on
the right of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Excessive waiting periods, registration fees and the like are all subject to scrutiny, lest they infringe on
constitutionally guaranteed rights.

At bottom, the Constitution requires sensible and effective regulation of guns that respects and upholds this most fundamental right. Policies motivated by nothing more
than discomfort with firearms, often born of a lack of experience, fall far short.

Messrs. Rivkin and Grossman practice law in the Washington, D.C., office of Baker Hostetler. Mr. Rivkin served in the Justice Department and the White House Counsel's
Office in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
~submitted by Gray Beard

February 09, 2013    Dr. Benjamin Carson's Amazing Speech at the National Prayer Breakfast with Obama Present

Dr. Carson addresses some of the issues facing America today by using sound reasoning and common sense solution, very refreshing... WATCH HERE

February 08, 2013   Carl Miller - The Constitution And The Bill Of Rights
    From: xxxxxx@yahoo.com]
    Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:41 PM
    To: dejure@jamadots.com
    Subject: RE: UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS

    I have studies in many subjects. Carl Miller is my champion! Look on youtube for him on constitutional rights. [emphasis added]
    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
~submitted by Tim P

[My note: I looked for Carl Miller on youtube and of course found him, he's here in Michigan!  He shares a lot of information in simple language.   VIDEO 1   2  3 ]

February 07, 2013   REQUEST TO GOVERNOR SNYDER ON GUN CONTROL

From: xxxx@my.dialzip.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:02 AM
To: Rick.Snyder@michigan.gov
Subject: Gun control

Governor Snyder,

This is a  request to sign a bill into law a bill  prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws or Regulations that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the Organic
Constitution of the United States.
ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable in the Township and
County described.
There is No delegation of power to any member of government to infringe on the Second Amendment!! Thus the term Shall Not Be Infringed!

Note ,The term in the Second Amendment “A Well Regulated Militia.”
Well Regulated has nothing whats so ever to do with any type of government control!
The term means that you are proficient in the use of your arms !
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site
( http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html) along with a lot of other good information.
Home page http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us

Some food for thought in some other Nations like Switzerland where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon's and ammunition in every home and are required to
attend regular training crime is near non existent.
Grey Beard

[My note: It would be great if everyone would email, send a letter, or call with this request to protect the people from the over-stepping power of the Federal Government,
reference  the Tenth Amendment and also scroll down to UNODA Article, then go to the
Militia page and scroll to read the DICK ACT.

From the
Tenth Amendment Center:
    The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United
    States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.” – United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733 (1931).

    The founding fathers had good reason to pen the Tenth Amendment.

    The issue of power – and especially the great potential for a power struggle between the federal and the state governments – was extremely important to the
    America’s founders. They deeply distrusted government power, and their goal was to prevent the growth of the type of government that the British has exercised
    over the colonies.

    Adoption of the Constitution of 1787 was opposed by a number of well-known patriots including Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and others.
    They passionately argued that the Constitution would eventually lead to a strong, centralized state power which would destroy the individual liberty of the People.
    Many in this movement were given the poorly-named tag “Anti-Federalists.”

    The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 largely because of the intellectual influence and personal persistence of the Anti-Federalists and their
    allies.

    It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers delegated to the federal government. In delegating just specific
    powers to the federal government, the states and the people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising their sovereign powers.

    When states and local communities take the lead on policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers are that much more accountable
    to the people. Few Americans have spoken with their president; many have spoken with their mayor.

    Adherence to the Tenth Amendment is the first step towards ensuring liberty in the United States. Liberty through decentralization.

The Bill of Rights is under attack, not just the Second Amendment but all of them in some form or another. They all must stand or none can stand and the over-reaching
power of the Federal Corporate Government is chipping away at them, we need to stop this chipping by NOT COMPROMISING ON ANY OF OUR RIGHTS]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TEXAS DECIDES TO REIN IN, "LIBERAL" CURRICULUM

Texas lawmakers have decided they want to rein in a controversial public school curriculum content and management system that at one point taught “Allah is God."

Most of the state’s classrooms, some 80 percent, are using the
CSCOPE program that also has raised eyebrows because educators had refused to allow parents and
others to see what being taught.

Twenty-five state representatives now have signed onto a proposed oversight statute that would target CSCOPE, the online system that set up firewalls and passwords so
that parents would not be able to see the curriculum.

Bill author State Rep. Steve Toth said, “It’s imperative that we bring CSCOPE under the direction and oversight of the locally elected members of the State Board of
Education. Repeated instances of impropriety along with a decidedly liberal leaning agenda makes this move of the utmost importance. ISDs all over the State of Texas
have been misled as to what CSCOPE is and what it contains. We’ve got to get this right.”
READ MORE

[My thought:  This could be very good for the rest of the country because most of our nations curriculum begins in Texas, but we need parents attending the school board
meetings and find out what their children are "really" being taught. It is our responsibility as parents, NOT the "village" or the UN to decide for us.  We must become
actively involved in our children's education, and it has been that inactively that is one of the variables in so many of our children graduating without the ability to read or
comprehend what is being read.  Michigan can do this too but we need parents that will stand up and say, "enough".  When our schools started programming propaganda
in the 70's by moving away from proper education, that is when many parents decided to home-school their children. It was good for their children and their education,
but unfortunately it did nothing to undo what was taking place in our schools and now we see the results of that shift away from true education to social programming.
<><]

February 06, 2013 [More action being taken by the people]  121101-Citizens Grand Jury Indictment
----- Original Message -----
From: @yahoo.com
To: xxxxx xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Federal Court Indicts [attachment linked above]

This transgression makes Watergate look like something from the sandbox.
This is only the tip of the berg.

xxxx
"If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."    
Joe Bannister
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.  Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

UNODA - UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS

Small Arms
Insurgents, armed gang members, pirates, terrorists - they can all multiply their force through the use of unlawfully acquired firepower. The illicit circulation of small
arms, light weapons and their ammunition destabilizes communities, and impacts security and development in all regions of the world.

A worldwide scourge
The illicit trade in small arms, light weapons and ammunition wreaks havoc everywhere. Mobs terrorizing a neighbourhood. Rebels attacking civilians or peacekeepers.
Drug lords randomly killing law enforcers or anyone else interfering with their illegal businesses. Bandits hijacking humanitarian aid convoys. In all continents, uncontrolled
small arms form a persisting problem.
READ FOR YOURSELF HERE

COMMON SENSE IMPLEMENTED:  First, where does the United Nations (UN) get the right to interfere with a Sovereign People (Americans) and our RIGHTS? By their
own words "ILLICIT TRADE" they are saying there is NO PROTECTION for the people, but yet they want to take the weapons that LAW ABIDING PEOPLE would
have for protection of self and their family.  Carefully read the above two paragraphs which are directly from UNODA, link above.  Now really think about this for a
moment and answer this question:  Do you really think a ban on small arms will keep you safe from "ILLICIT GUN TRADE"?  Do you think this illicit trade will stop?  
Now think about "Fast and Furious", the US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT GAVE WEAPONS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL, really think about that for a
moment. Do you really want only the GOVERNMENT AND THE DRUG LORDS OR LAW BREAKERS TO HAVE GUNS?  
There is going to be another vote in March on the UN Small Arms Gun Ban.  Contrast this against  Switzerland that has the lowest crime rate in the world, is it because
their guns are banned?  No, it is just the opposite, every home has a rifle and/or a handgun, that is at least about 99% of them, contrast that with Chicago that has some of
the most stringent gun laws in the country and  crime is very high, and look at what Australia  has to say since their guns have been banned
VIDEO

NO AMERICAN should be supporting this or any ban on weapons of any kind in our country, and if they do , they are NOT AMERICANS in the true sense of the word,
because it is not only our Bill of Rights, but it is also COMMON SENSE for our own protection. There are Americans that are US citizens only to conduct commerce; then
there are US citizens that are married to the system in ideology and perhaps even took an Oath to the UNITED NATIONS, and in their mind it supersedes their
Constitutional Oath to the people, such as politicians and
provocateurs to do their bidding (Agent (Provocateur Law & Legal Definition ... Disrupt the activities of radical
political groups in the U.S)

We already have all the laws we need against criminals having guns, but yet they still have them, and they still will if they are banned.  Has anyone heard of the 'Black
Market'!  Look back at history, the first act that took place before complete tyranny of the people BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT was a banning of guns, the ability to
protect themselves. Contrary to what some people choose to believe this CAN happen in America and is.

If common sense doesn't speak to your heart, then let me share this information:  

    "Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled
    that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate."

With this ruling the DEFACTO UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT would once again be ignoring the LAW if they attempt to enact the UNITED NATIONS
Small Arms Treaty that is in conflict with our Constitutional BILL OF RIGHTS that BIND THE OVER-STEPPING REACH OF THE GOVERNMENT against the American
people.  Then follow the above case with the below information:
:
    BLACK, J., Judgment of the Court - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 354 U.S. 1 - Reid v. Covert

    Article VI, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, declares:

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority
    of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . .

    There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution. Nor
    is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a result. These debates, as well as the
    history that surrounds the adoption of the treaty provision in Article VI, make it clear that the reason treaties were not limited to those made in "pursuance" of the
    Constitution was so that agreements made by the United States under the Articles of Confederation, including the important peace treaties which concluded the
    Revolutionary [p17] War, would remain in effect. [n31] It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those
    who were responsible for the Bill of Rights -- let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition -- to construe Article VI as permitting the United States
    to exercise power under an international agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. [n32] In effect, such construction would permit amendment of
    that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government, and
    they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and the Senate combined.

    There is nothing new or unique about what we say here. This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty. [n33]
    For example, in Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267, it declared:

    The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of
    the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It would not be contended that it
    extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the [p18] government, or in that of one of the States, or a
    cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.

    This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which must comply with the Constitution, is on a full parity with a treaty, and that, when
    a statute which is subsequent in time is inconsistent with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict renders the treaty null. [n34] It would be completely
    anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute that must conform to that instrument.
    Reference

So, how do we combat such blatant corruption of our BILL OF RIGHTS by those that are suppose to be protecting them?  Well, here is one way that people are taking
action.  This was sent to me today:

    From: isaiah
    Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 6:24 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Subject: this is going to my local boards, give me your input

    The below should be done in every twp and county and state.

    February 8 2013

    TO Newberg Township and Cass County Board Commissioners,

    A open request to adopt An ordnance prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment to the
    Organic Constitution of the United States.

    “ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable.”

    NOTE: The term in the Second Amendment, “A Well Regulated Militia.” Well regulated has nothing whatsoever to do with any type of
    government control!
    The term means that you are “proficient in the use of your arms!”
    The definitions at the time can be found on this web site (http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us/news.html)  along with a lot of other good
    information.
    home page  http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.us
    Some food for thought in some other Nations where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon and ammunition in every home and they
    are required to attend regular training the crime is near non existent, Switzerland is one and they have the lowest crime rate in the world.

This is what it takes people, we are the solution, and its right where we are, and we must, with RESOLVE demand our RIGHTS be protected, and. what good is the UN
Small Arms Ban if each local township, city and/or state has laws making it null and void?  The same can be done for all the other atrocities that are being carried out on
the American people. We...the people, which is "of, by, and for the people" can get it done if we come together in our own communities to protect our own RIGHTS.  It is
lawful, and our DUTY to do so, reference
"The Declaration of Independence:
    The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

    "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
    political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
    earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
    them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes
    which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
    their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
    of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
    their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government
    becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
    institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in
    such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence,
    indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and
    transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to
    suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they
    are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
    Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty,
    to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.— Such has
    been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
    them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great
    Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
    establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a
    candid world." [ Read the Facts by scrolling down on the DOI Document]

My final note is, I pray every American will ponder the information presented and each individual will search their heart for TRUTH and stand on that truth, because that is
what separated America from the rest of the world, not the US Government, but the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE and the RIGHTS given to us by OUR CREATOR.  This is
why so many migrated to America, something that most all natural Americans do not understand, but soon will if this self-destructive course we're on is not diverted.
A very wise person said, "The cork won't pop until pressure is applied at the bottom".  Are we going to lawfully and peaceably "pop the cork" and "release our freedom out
of the hands of those that are attempting to take them, instead of honoring their oaths to protect them? <><

February 05, 2013  NULLIFICATION DENIERS: WHAT JAMES MADISON REALLY SAID  By Publius Huldah

    -----Original Message-----
    From: isaiah
    Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:11 PM
    To: publiushuldah@gmail.com
    Subject: NULLIFICATION DENIERS: WHAT JAMES MADISON REALLY SAID

    I see several writers on this news site talking about the organic constitution . The issuer you fail to see is the fact that the constitution is not in control or law at this
    time!. You are living under a corporate charter, see act of 1871, and the Emergency war powers Act of 1933!!
    The criminals in Washington DISTRICT OF CRIMINALS are not going to give up their GRAVY TRAIN . The only thing that can be done is the people all have to
    come together and enforce the Declaration of Independence and abolish this whole and complete form of government and start over new.

Article:  Nullification Deniers:  What James Madison Really Said posted on NewsWithViews.com

    This is The Age of Ignorance. Our “intellectuals” can’t think. Our “scholars” parrot each other. The self-educated fixate on idiotic theories. Our People despise
    Truth and disseminate lies.
    Nullification deniers such as Matthew Spalding of Heritage Foundation, Jarrett Stepman of Human Events, law professor Randy Barnett, David Barton of
    Wallbuilders, and history professor Allen C. Guelzo, say that nullification by States of unconstitutional acts of the federal government is unlawful and impossible.
    They make the demonstrably false assertions that:
    • States don’t have the right to nullify unconstitutional acts of the federal government because our Constitution doesn’t say they can do it;
    • Nullification is literally impossible;
    • The supreme Court is the final authority on what is constitutional and what is not; and The States and The People must submit to whatever the supreme Court
    says; and
    • James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, opposed nullification.
    Their assertions contradict our Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, our federal Constitution, and what James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and
    Alexander Hamilton really said. CONTINUE  READING
~submitted by Gary Beard
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EXTREME CAUTION BANKSTER ALERT!

----- Original Message -----
From: Teri H
To: Teri H
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:11 PM
Subject: EXTREME CAUTION, BANKSTER ALERT!

Today a friend called to say that when his wife went down to their bank, Nashville Bank in Tenn. to renew the equity line of credit on their home she came home and told
him to go up to the bank and sign the papers. His name has never been on the loan so he went to the bank to straighten everything out. When he got there and he was given
the papers his wife had signed he found that on the bottom of every page in BOLD type it said that:

BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT YOU WAIVE YOUR RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN REGARD TO ANY AND ALL EVENTS AND OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY
ARISE FROM IT

Fortunately my friend is far to savvy to have fallen for that. He threw a fit and demanded the bank explain what they thought they were trying to pull. The loan officer
called the main branch and then said, well we could take that off of there....( DUH! )
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES SIGN ANY DOCUMENT WITH EVEN SIMILAR LANGUAGE TO THAT ON IT. By signing that agreement they would
have been waiving all their rights to due process under the law and our Constitution. If the smaller banks like Nashville Bank are attempting this kind of entrapment you can
bet the BIG BANKS LED THE WAY!
If you have inadvertently signed such a document in the last three days get your butt back down to the  bank and exercise your three day right to rescission!
This is unconscionable and cannot be tolerated. If the fraudster banks can get you to renew your loans and or mortgages with language like that in the documents they
have carte blanche ability to STEAL EVERYTHING YOU HAVE and you have NO POWER TO STOP THEM AND NO RECOURSE AFTERWARD!
--
Teri

"A nation...cannot survive treason from within...the traitor ...wears the face of his victims,...and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots
the soul of a nation—he works secretly...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared......." Cicero, 42 B.C.E.

February 04, 2013  Henson Ong at Gun Violence Prevention Public Hearing - Hartford, CT - VIDEO
Mr. Ong is a Legal Immigrant that CHOSE to become an American.  Please watch/listen to the video (link above) and learn.  He showed up to support his chosen country
and defend the RIGHTS he has as an American citizen. We...the people that are natural born to our rights haven't a clue why they are in place or exactly what they mean
and how important they are, but those that were born in other countries completely understand and are standing to defend them. It is time all people stand together and set
aside our differences to understand what TRUE FREEDOM looks like for everyone.  The defacto corporate system created this division and continues to do so to keep our
focus off them and what they doing.  It's not working for them anymore, people have had enough! Please
WATCH
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
New York State Resistance
With no soundtrack - Complete 33 minute video is here - Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the Arms Bill

[This is how it is done folks, but we have to show up to the meetings in numbers.  We have the power of the people. Also, a reference is made to "brown shirts" for those
that are younger and do not know what this reference is, since so much history has been removed from textbooks, he is referring to Hitler's Brown Shirt, NAZI POLICE
FORCE.  
WATCH VIDEO]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Former Michigan Supreme Court Justice Diane Hathaway pleads guilty to bank fraud  READ
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RONALD REAGAN SPEECH
Ronald Reagan's church put this together to commemorate the birthday of Ronald Reagan.
Boy, how far have WE slipped in just a few short years!
VIDEO
~submitted by DF
[My thought:  This is an excellent speech and every American should listen to it a few times, then go to the Video Resource (fifth down on page), and watch the video of
JFK's speech, contrast the two and what they are saying.  Since President Reagan, our country's values have slide into the gutter, and corruption is at all levels for all to
see and no action is taken against it, except to make laws taking the rights from the virtuous people that do not need them.  The people can restore value to our nation by
restoring Almighty God and giving His Commandments back to the people, and mainly our children. We...the people can do it by restoring our religious values, and at the
same time our de jure republic in our local communities. The people at the local levels need to kick out the UN agenda that is being implemented by the defacto US
Corporate government.  We, the people need to stand shoulder to shoulder defending our RIGHTS, ALL OF OUR RIGHTS FOR ALL PEOPLE.  We must defend all the
Rights and not just the ones that individually we are partial to.  All our rights stand, or all our rights will most certainly fall, and they are for all people, because if all are not
free, nobody is truly free<><]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx
To: xxxxx xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:03 AM
Subject: ... Too Great not to Share  [this email had numerous pictures that could not be shared here due to space, and the message was to pray for our military because of
this below statement:]

    The ACLU has filed a suit to end prayer from the military completely. They're making great progress.. The Navy Chaplains
    can no longer mention Jesus' name in prayer thanks to the ACLU and others.

[The senders comment:]
It is very apparent that the ACLU is more interested in pushing an atheistic agenda instead of being truly concerned
with our rights.  Keep this prayer request moving through your email list.
~submitted by Steve

[My thought and reply: The ACLU would not be able to do this if the people in the military protested against it, until the people stop allowing this usurpation of their rights it
will continue.  Ronald Reagan said this about our First Amendment:

    "The First Amendment was not written to protect people and their laws from religious values, it was written to
    protect those values from government tyranny."   WATCH VIDEO

The "people:" are key to everything, just as the defacto is attempting another gun grab they will continue to completely remove Almighty God as well, but they can only do
this if the people will NOT STAND AND DEFEND THEIR RIGHTS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, THEIR FAITH AND THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS IT!!.

We can pray for our military as most do, but ultimately it is only within their power to change it, and might I add
they take an oath to uphold the Constitution, but yet they
are allowing their own FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to be taken, or someone else's of a different faith.  It is those that are directly affected by these edicts that need to
stand up and say "NO", just as it was when parents allowed prayer to be taken out of our schools, now look at the mess they are in, they can't learn the Ten
Commandments but they can learn how to properly apply a condom, such disgrace to our country, and the education of our children.<><]

February 01, 2013   A Letter From The SPECIAL FORCES COMMUNITY Concerning The Second Amendment
Excerpt from the letter:
    “The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and tyranny. Consider the
    words of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story”: ‘The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who have duly reflected upon the subject.
    The militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is
    against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which
    they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people.
    The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against
    the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."  
Further down it reads:
    "So, what do we believe will be effective? First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control problem; it is a complex sociological problem. No
    single course of action will solve the problem. Therefore, it is our recommendation that a series of diverse steps be undertaken, the implementation of which will
    require patience and diligence to realize an effect. These are as follows:

    1. First and foremost we support our Second Amendment right in that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people
    to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.

    2. We support State and Local School Boards in their efforts to establish security protocols in whatever manner and form that they deem necessary and adequate.
    One of the great strengths of our Republic is that State and Local governments can be creative in solving problems. Things that work can be shared. Our point is
    that no one knows what will work and there is no one single solution, so let’s allow the State and Local governments with the input of the citizens to make the
    decisions. Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first district in North Texas to consider allowing some teachers to carry
    concealed guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do support their right to make this decision for themselves.

    3. We recommend that Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) laws be passed in every State. AOT is formerly known as Involuntary Outpatient Commitment (IOC)
    and allows the courts to order certain individuals with mental disorders to comply with treatment while living in the community. In each of the mass shooting
    incidents the perpetrator was mentally unstable. We also believe that people who have been adjudicated as incompetent should be simultaneously examined to
    determine whether they should be allowed the right to retain/purchase firearms.

    4. We support the return of firearm safety programs to schools along the lines of the successful “Eddie the Eagle” program, which can be taught in schools by
    Peace Officers or other trained professionals.

    5. Recent social psychology research clearly indicates that there is a direct relationship between gratuitously violent movies/video games and desensitization to real
    violence and increased aggressive behavior particularly in children and young adults (See Nicholas L. Carnagey, et al. 2007. “The effect of video game violence on
    physiological desensitization to real-life violence” and the references therein. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43:489-496). Therefore, we strongly
    recommend that gratuitous violence in movies and video games be discouraged. War and war-like behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video game
    producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman famously said “War is Hell!” Leave war to the Professionals. War is not a game and
    should not be “sold” as entertainment to our children.

    6. We support repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. This may sound counter-intuitive, but it obviously isn’t working. It is our opinion that “Gun-Free
    Zones” anywhere are too tempting of an environment for the mentally disturbed individual to inflict their brand of horror with little fear of interference. While
    governmental and non-governmental organizations, businesses, and individuals should be free to implement a Gun-Free Zone if they so choose, they should also
    assume Tort liability for that decision.

    7. We believe that border states should take responsibility for implementation of border control laws to prevent illegal shipments of firearms and drugs. Drugs have
    been illegal in this country for a long, long time yet the Federal Government manages to seize only an estimated 10% of this contraband at our borders. Given this
    dismal performance record that is misguided and inept (“Fast and Furious”), we believe that border States will be far more competent at this mission.

    8. This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than abdicate that
    responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to stand by our principles and act
    in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.

    The undersigned Quiet Professionals hereby humbly stand ever present, ever ready, and ever vigilant.
    1100 Green Berets Signed this Letter
    We have a list of all their names and unlike any MSM outlets we can confirm that over 1100 Green Berets did sign. The list includes Special Forces Major Generals
    & Special Forces Command Sergeants Major down to the lowest ranking “Green Beret”. [Read Entire Letter Here: LINK  PDF]
~submitted by Cathy C
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Who is Our Sheriff Working For?
When a society allows its political leaders to pass unjust laws the people suffer. When only just laws are enforced, the people's lives, liberty and property are respected. In
a where just laws prevail the result is peace, prosperity and freedom.
In a society that embraces only just laws the court system promotes equal justice, but when unjust laws are passed and enforced injustice prevails and the Courts destroy
the justice they were created to provide..When unjust laws become commonplace the government becomes the usurper of power and begins to extend special benefits and
privileges to certain groups and individuals at the expense others.
Any law that violates the principles spelled out in the Constitution are unjust. The Sheriffs have been elected to protect our rights and were to be the guardians of our liberty
and the defender of our Constitution. It was stated years ago that it is sometimes necessary for a patriot to defend his country from his government. The Constitution was
written to control the government not to control the people.
A County Sheriff must decide whether he or she will honor their oath or be an administrative assistant to the President of the United States. The Sheriff can not serve two
masters. He must take his marching orders from the people or the President.. It is up to us to elect righteous men or women to serve as our County Sheriff.
As a resident of the county, we have a right to know if our Sheriff had their fingers crossed when they promised to uphold the Constitution. We need to contact every
single County Sheriff in the land and find out who they are working for.
~submitted by WRAM

n of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was wondering if you were going to join these Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country that have
stated such? One Un-Constitutional mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example. Specifically, "assault rifles"
which is a bogus label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would qualify as an "assault rifle" in operation. You and I know the legislation will
include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have seen them do in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a statement to the
Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful laws against the Citizens of
your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that elected duty. I also encourage you to belong to CSPOA
www.constitutionpreservation.
org/constitution-preservation/cspoa-bill-rights-presentation  Please write me back with your views on this matter as I would hate to be one of many Citizens in other
counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with violating their Sworn Oath of Office and kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank you for your diligence on
this matter.
Sincerely,
xxx xxxxx
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Nx5MJNINQ      
www.newswithviews.com/Gilbertson/gil103.htm
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5390
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
-----------------------------
    Reply:
    From: Chuck Vondra <vondrac@charlevoixcounty.org>
    To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    Sent: Fri, January 25, 2013 1:42:16 PM
    Subject: RE: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
    xxx,
    As far as I am concerned this is real simple. We abide by the oath we have taken to uphold the constitution of this state and the United States . We are not federal
    agents and do not take direction from them. My boss is the elected Sheriff of Charlevoix County. We follow the laws that empower him as Sheriff.
    Chuck
-------------------------------
    From: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    To: Chuck Vondra
    Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:46 PM
    Subject: Re: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

    Chuck,
    Thank you for your timely response. I appreciate your answers. What or where exactly are those "laws that empower him as Sheriff"? Could I find a copy of those
    somewhere? Did you receive the booklet I left at your office awhile back, about The Constitutional Sheriff written by Ex-Sheriff Richard Mack? Have you had a
    chance to read it? What did you think of the booklet, and these enclosed links of the original e-mail I just sent? Are you willing to join a group like CSPOA? Thanks
    for your time Chuck, I appreciate it. xxx  
~submitted by DF
January 31, 2013  THE LAW
From: Cathy C
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:14 AM
To: undisclosed recipients:
Subject: The Law

That brings me to what I wish to share today on this subject. I received an article from
http://usa-the-republic.com/jurisprudentia/index.html via email earlier today
and it is so VERY important to our understanding, both of what we are doing and why our country is such a putrid pool of corruption run by self-serving lawyers/judges
today. I am going to paste the article here and interject my comments in red as I usually do. I don’t know who the original author is or I would certainly cite credit to him
or her. Instead I have included the url to the site the article originally came from…..

Click on the link posted in the above for some more education.  Taken from the site americannationalmilitia.com.  Very informative and might I say the "truth" will set you
free.
[h
ttp://www.usa-the-republic.com]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Below are two Supreme court cases of interest, but would be ruled too old to be used in court today!!

Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:42 AM
Subject:
TWO SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THE ANTI-GUNNERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE -- Worden
~submitted by Gray Beard
[For sake of space I put the Decisions in a PDF file (link above), and to comment on the writers statement, "ruled too old to be used in court today", then The Dick Act
would be too old, and where that leave our Founding Documents?  That is the argument used by the Progressives to make "NULL AND VOID" our Bill of Rights, and the
Ten Commandments are even older, must be why they were thrown out as well, so sad! <><]

January 30, 2013  Geneva Conventions treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:05 AM
Subject: Geneva Conventions treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers

Due to the actions of the occupiers in every state of the union, we need to review the GC treaties...as there has been a Declared War In and Upon Every State in the
Union, not just a police action.  War on Crime, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Drugs.

We are at the very least "Injured Casualties"...if arrested "Prisoner of War"!

The War's on Terrorism around the globe are not declared, a bypass of the GC Treaties is accomplished!

Only on the North America can we resoundingly say a War of some sorts is in a Theater of War Actions that you reside in!   
www.law.cornell.edu/wex/geneva_conventions
Geneva Conventions in overview
    The Geneva Conventions are a series of treaties on the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers who are otherwise rendered hors de
    combat, or incapable of fighting. The first Convention was initiated by the International Committee for Relief to the Wounded (which became the
    International Committee for the Red Cross and Red Crescent). This convention produced a treaty designed to protect wounded and sick soldiers during
    wartime. The Swiss Government agreed to hold the Conventions in Geneva, and a few years later, a similar agreement to protect shipwrecked soldiers was
    produced. In 1949, after World War II, two new Conventions were added to the original two, and all four were ratified by a number of countries. The 1949
    versions of the Conventions, along with two additional Protocols, are in force today.

    Convention I: This Convention protects wounded and infirm soldiers and medical personnel against attack, execution without judgment, torture, and assaults
    upon personal dignity (Article 3). It also grants them the right to proper medical treatment and care.

    Convention II: This agreement extended the protections mentioned in the first Convention to shipwrecked soldiers and other naval forces, including special
    protections afforded to hospital ships.

    Convention III: One of the treaties created during the 1949 Convention, this defined what a Prisoner of War was, and accorded them proper and humane
    treatment as specified by the first Convention. Specifically, it required POWs to give only their name, rank, and serial number to their captors. Nations party
    to the Convention may not use torture to extract information from POWs.

    Convention IV: Under this Convention, civilians are afforded the protections from inhumane treatment and attack afforded in the first Convention to sick and
    wounded soldiers. Furthermore, additional regulations regarding the treatment of civilians were introduced. Specifically, it prohibits attacks on civilian
    hospitals, medical transports, etc. It also specifies the right of internees, and those who commit acts of sabotage. Finally, it discusses how occupiers are to
    treat an occupied populace.

    Protocol I: In this additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, the signing Nations agreed to further restrictions on the treatment of "protected persons"
    according to the original Conventions. Furthermore, clarification of the terms used in the Conventions was introduced. Finally, new rules regarding the
    treatment of the deceased, cultural artifacts, and dangerous targets (such as dams and nuclear installations) were produced.

    Protocol II: In this Protocol, the fundamentals of "humane treatment" were further clarified. Additionally, the rights of interned persons were specifically
    enumerated, providing protections for those charged with crimes during wartime. It also identified new protections and rights of civilian populations.
    •        The United States has ratified the four Conventions of 1949, but has not ratified the two additional Protocols of 1977.
    •        Disputes arising under the Conventions or the Protocols additional to them are settled by courts of the member nations (Article 49 of Convention I) or
    by international tribunals.
    •        The International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent has a special role given by the Geneva Conventions, whereby it handles, and is
    granted access to, the wounded, sick, and POWs.
~submitted by Gray Beard

[My thought: Please pay attention to this statement from above: "there has been a Declared War In and Upon Every State in the union, not just a police action.  War on
Crime, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Drugs".   Now, read the definition of War from the 1828 dictionary:

    1828 Definition WAR, n. [G., to perplex, embroil, disturb. The primary sense of the root is to strive, struggle, urge, drive, or to turn, to twist.]

    1. A contest between nations or states, carried on by force, either for defense, or for revenging insults and redressing wrongs, for the extension of
    commerce or acquisition of territory, or for obtaining and establishing the superiority and dominion of one over the other. These objects are accomplished
    by the slaughter or capture of troops, and the capture and destruction of ships, towns and property. Among rude nations, war is often waged and carried on
    for plunder. As war is the contest of nations or states, it always implies that such contest is authorized by the monarch or the sovereign power of the nation.
    When war is commenced by attacking a nation in peace, it si called an offensive war, and such attack is aggressive. When war is undertaken to repel
    invasion or the attacks of an enemy, it is called defensive, and a defensive war is considered as justifiable. Very few of the wars that have desolated nations
    and deluged the earth with blood, have been justifiable. Happy would it be for mankind, if the prevalence of Christian principles might ultimately extinguish
    the spirit of war, and if the ambition to be great, might yield to the ambition of being good.[emphasis added<><]

Please take a moment to reflect on what was said above, compare it to the definition of WAR, then in truth look at what is happening across America; and the turmoil it is
in. Poverty, Crime, Terrorism, and Drugs are increasing expotentially even in our rural communities due to the policies coming from the US CORPORATION, aka,
DEFACTO US GOVERNMENT, which is a  SUBSIDIARY of the UNITED NATIONS,  which openly and publicly declared WAR on the people of America.  Their war
on crime, poverty, terrorism, and drugs are actually responsible for escalating these social ills to a critical degree of chaos and hardship for the American people, all the
while taking more and more of our liberties under the guise of fighting these wars to protect the people.  We...the people do NOT need their kind of protection. These are
wars the people did not ask for, and wars that have been going on for years to plunder our nation of its wealth and to remove the RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE. These
internal wars are what is destroying freedom and liberty for the people in order to give CORPORATIONS total control of wealth and power over the people.  These are
wars that will NEVER END because they (CORPORATE DEFACTO GOVERNMENT AKA US/UN) are the most guilty of them all, its called "job security.". Look around,
we are a WAR TORN COUNTRY!

SOLUTION:  Yes, there is a solution, but it has to come from the people.  We as the American people need to flood our council, school board, commissioner meetings.
We need to audit the books of every public office and start writing new "By-Laws" in our Townships, cities, and counties.  We need to peaceably declare war on the
defacto corporation according to our Bill of Rights, Constitution, and Declaration of Independence, that gives us the right to dotso. It is time for the people to stand
together and perform our CIVIC DUTY.  To reinstate the balance of powers that is in the hands of the people to do so.  Arm yourself with COMMON SENSE,
WISDOM, AND A STRONG RESOLVE TO RIGHT THE WRONGS ACCORDING TO TRUTH.  As a people, we know what is taking place is wrong, we know the
corruption is everywhere and we know we are being RULED by CORPORATE EDICTS that have replaced our de jure republic common law, so why do we continue to
look the other way?  <><]

January 28, 2013      Freedom, Life, Liberty  - TREASON FROM THE BENCH
From: Freedom Warrior PAG
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 1:04 AM
To: dejure
Subject: Freedom, Life, Liberty

Hi Bonnie,

I strongly urge you to listen to this audio recording describing how all these judges are committing treason from the bench.
Also describing how the Constitutional sheriff's are the only lawful militia law enforcement authorized to serve and protect the People, especially from a tyrannical
government such as this one.
It also teaches how all presidential "executive orders" and legislation do not apply to the People, but only apply to the administration (government employees) within the 10
square miles of the corporate "UNITED STATES" and all its subcorporations. It shows all the laws that prove it!
Please get this out to all the sheriff's on the list as well as every American! It is important they educate themselves regarding our god-given NATURAL rights as they apply
to the People.
The government has no authority or jurisdiction over the masters; We the People
Here is the link:

Audio Recording: 'EPISODE692 - AIB RADIO- TREASON FROM THE BENCH' From 'AIB RADIO'

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/audioPop.jsp?episodeId=710434&cmd=apop

Please pass it on and encourage the People, Sheriff's and others to educate themselves.

-Freedom Warrior
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
TAPS
  -  When they play Taps, do you know the words?

TURN THE SOUND ON  LISTEN PPS

When I  was young I learned how to play a trumpet.  My grandfather was a
former member of the Army Band and taught me how to  play Taps and the words
I forgot most of the words.   This is interesting to know.   The final
salute to fallen soldiers.   A terrific story of its beginning.
~Cathy C

January 27, 2013    Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
From: xxx xxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:03 AM
To: Don Schneider
Cc: Chuck Vondra
Subject: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

Dear Sirs,
There is a tremendous amount of Oath violating of the Constitution of the United States going on today by politicians in Washington D.C.  My understanding is that you
gentlemen took an Oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was wondering if you were going to join these
Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country that have stated such? One Un-Constitutional mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our
Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example. Specifically, "assault rifles" which is a bogus label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would
qualify as an "assault rifle" in operation. You and I know the legislation will include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have
seen them do in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a statement to the Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you
too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful laws against the Citizens of your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that elected duty. I
also encourage you to belong to CSPOA
www.constitutionpreservation.org/constitution-preservation/cspoa-bill-rights-presentation  Please write me back with your views
on this matter as I would hate to be one of many Citizens in other counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with violating their Sworn Oath of Office and
kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank you for your diligence on this matter.
Sincerely,
xxx xxxxx
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Nx5MJNINQ      
www.newswithviews.com/Gilbertson/gil103.htm
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5390
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
-----------------------------
    Reply:
    From: Chuck Vondra <vondrac@charlevoixcounty.org>
    To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    Sent: Fri, January 25, 2013 1:42:16 PM
    Subject: RE: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
    xxx,
    As far as I am concerned this is real simple. We abide by the oath we have taken to uphold the constitution of this state and the United States . We are not federal
    agents and do not take direction from them. My boss is the elected Sheriff of Charlevoix County. We follow the laws that empower him as Sheriff.
    Chuck
-------------------------------
    From: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    To: Chuck Vondra
    Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:46 PM
    Subject: Re: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

    Chuck,
    Thank you for your timely response. I appreciate your answers. What or where exactly are those "laws that empower him as Sheriff"? Could I find a copy of those
    somewhere? Did you receive the booklet I left at your office awhile back, about The Constitutional Sheriff written by Ex-Sheriff Richard Mack? Have you had a
    chance to read it? What did you think of the booklet, and these enclosed links of the original e-mail I just sent? Are you willing to join a group like CSPOA? Thanks
    for your time Chuck, I appreciate it. xxx  
~submitted by DF

January 25, 2013   Massachusetts State House Firearms Rally 1/19/2013 - Amazing Chinese-American Perspective
Excellent Speech!
Published on Jan 20, 2013
January 19th, 2013
This gentleman was kind enough to share his perspective on the second amendment and its importance in keeping us a free society. His perspective is like no other, as he
has seen first hand the powerful fist of tyranny when allowed to act with impunity.
LISTEN TO SPEECH
~submitted by Richard B
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

With all the protesting taking place across this nation I hope many will participate on February 8th in Lansing at the capital building.  Also, we need to flood the phone lines
and email boxes of all those that are in office to serve the people, and remind them of this.  If we don't like what is happening within this country then WE must all stand
together to correct it.  If we do not defend our Bill of Rights, then our Constitution and Declaration of Independence will be made "null and void", think long and hard
what that will mean.  

There is blatant evidence of the defacto corporate (fed) governments intentions just by the "trampling" they have already done to our rights, and we've said nothing.  The
new buzz phrase they are using to program the people through mind control is "Gun Violence", do NOT fall for this.  It is "PEOPLE VIOLENCE" and this is what needs to
consistently be brought to the forefront.  And this PEOPLE VIOLENCE is from their immorality and corruption that spread across our land.  Switzerland has the lowest
crime rate in the world, WHY?  BECAUSE THE WISE GOVERNMENT OF SWITZERLAND REQUIRES EVERY HOME TO HAVE NOT ONLY A RIFLE BUT A
HANDGUN AS WELL.  
We cannot continue to target crime by making more laws for those that do not break the law...this is insane!  The defacto Corporate DC government is insane, they keep
doing the same thing over and over expecting different results, or do they really expect different results?  Perhaps all of the politicians should be declared "mentally
incompetent to serve" and relieved from duty by the people.  If we do not return COMMON SENSE from ABSOLUTE TRUTHS to this country, well, God have mercy on
us all, for we truly are a wretched lot and we'll be deserving of the most certain consequences of our choices.  

We must be mindful of the words they use and why they are using them, and alert others.  It is programming, brainwashing or mind control, whatever you want to call it
and it started with "political correctness".  That was when we lost our First Amendment Right and we didn't even realize it.  Will we also give them our Second
Amendment Right as well?  It is so simple, the people just have to stand up and tell them, "NO INFRINGING ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN ANY FORM FOR
NO REASON".  Do not fall for their words of "caring" because if they did care they'd stop giving the delusion of doing something by taking more rights away from the
law abiding citizens. They'd restore common law and actually seek justice for the victims of criminal actions, no matter the political position or wealth of the perpetrator.  
This would be 'caring' about the people they are in office to serve.

Even if you don't own guns, you should be very thankful that others do to protect you.  You've heard of "home invasion" correct? If you haven't, here is a quick lesson, a
home invader comes into your home "WHILE YOU ARE HOME", unlike the burglar's of yesteryear that waited until nobody was home. A home invader will come into
your home and terrorize your family and do what they will to you and your children according to their own desires, and they stay as long as they want. Not having a gun
in the house gives them complete power over you, now if your neighbor has a gun and realizes something isn't right, well, he could come to the protection of your family.  
This is also why it is so important to develop relationships with your neighbors.  Home intruder
VIDEO with a good ending because of a gun. You see mainstream media
does not report ALL the lives that are saved because of armed citizens, the truth would not fit well with their UN agenda to ban guns in America.

This is merely another political power grab, but it is the most serious for all Americans; remember the science lesson about the frog in water, this attempt to infringe on
our Second Amendment  right in any way is the boiling point.  Get everyone you know to make the calls to Lansing and give them a "directive" to defend "We..the people"
of Michigan and our SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT, UNINFRINGED UPON PERIOD.  The FREE states have the authority to stop the power grabs of the UN
controlled US Federal Corporation government, and the free state is its "people".  It's our TENTH AMENDMENT.  Sheriff Mack says, "the sheriff is the highest
governmental authority in his county. Within that jurisdiction – inside his county – the sheriff has more power than the governor of his state. Indeed, the sheriff has more
power in his county than the President of the United States. In his county, he can overrule the President and kick his people out. Remember, the President has few and
limited powers." We are in the eleventh hour, it is time for all to find out exactly who the sheriff  is in our counties and "recall" them if they are not going to do honor their
constitutional oath to defend and protect the rights of the people in their county. <><

January 24, 2013   My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attempt to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

From: xxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:42 AM
To: Senator Debbie Stabenow
Subject: Re: My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attempt to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

Us senator from Michigan  Debbie Stabenow,    [this email is a response to the letter received from the Senator, below]
It has nothing to do with hunting you are in fact trying to dis arm the wrong people. You have to dis arm the criminals and the government morons that go around doing
these horrendous acts to further government agenda's.
HOW MANY OF YOU CARRY AND HOW MANY OF YOUR BODY GUARDS OR ESCORTS ARE ARMED?
If you don't want we the people armed you must first disarm the criminals and the cabal in Washington District of Criminals.
Your mentor Adolf Hitler proved gun control doesn’t work. We see that some of your people are now infiltrating the public schools see article below and put a stop to it
and lift their tax status.  We know they have a 501 c3 tax status.

""Tell the Truth and Shame the Southern Poverty Law Center
The homosexual activist group, Southern Poverty Law Center, has attempted to infiltrate the public school system with their newly designed entry-level “diversity”
program called “Mix It Up” day. The goal of “Mix It Up” day is to force the acceptance of homosexuality into public schools – even at elementary and junior high levels.
They listed schools on their website that were “participants” of “Mix It Up” day. However, the SPLC was.......
/
www.newswithviews.com/Bradlee/dean102.htm
by Bradlee Dean""
Charlie
bcc to list circulate far and wide

On 01/23/2013 06:07 PM, Senator Debbie Stabenow wrote:  
LETTER
~submitted by Gray Beard

January 23, 2013  Letter from Sheriff Tim Mueller to VP Biden - Perhaps this should be printed and sent to all Sheriffs in Michigan
Sheriff Tim Mueller is defending the citizens of Linn County Oregon against the unconstitutional laws that DC is proposing against our Second Amendment Right.  He is
giving notice to Mr. Biden that he will not enforce the laws in his county.  View
LETTER
~submitted by Gray Beard
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
FREEDOMS ARE DISAPPEARING, GOVERNMENT POWERS GROWING - WHY INFORMED PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED
The idea of suspending the Constitution was first presented in the mid 1980s during the Reagan administration.   No less a thug than the drug-dealing, murder-ordering,
terrorist-supporting Oliver North was knee deep in the program.   Since then every US president - George Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, and Barack Obama - have
steadily created oppressive laws and legal systems to "fight terrorism" while simultaneously violating basic Constitutional rights.   Simultaneously with this, the US military
has received training on how to suppress the rights of and even attack US citizens on US soil. US police have been increasingly militarized and new armed federal agencies
have spouted like weeds.   Why?   Doesn't the US have enough serious problems to attend to without the need to laboriously create new "programs" to fight non-existent
or government manufactured problems?   Instead the ONLY thing the US government has done consistently over the last 30 years (besides wage illegal wars and give Wall
Street criminals a "get out of jail free" card) is create new secret "internal security" laws, bureaucracies, infrastructure and armed bodies.

["Internal Security" perhaps for their own protection from those that are learning the truth about what they've been doing for the past 30 years, please watch this short
footage that comes from their own words
VIDEO]                                
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
UCC FILINGS
The link above will provide some UCC information that might be useful for those that are seeking personal remedy from the admiralty "fictional system".  Our de jure
republic is completely separate from UCC, which is the defacto system of commerce.  We use it because it is the only system to conduct business with when FRN's are
involved.  Our De Jure Republic is of, by, and for the people, and Constitutionally is separate from the defacto system.  It is about freedom NOT COMMERCE, and it is
for ALL NATURAL BORN PEOPLE OF AMERICA, not just Secured Party Creditors seeking remedy using the UCC System.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
AGENDA:
Grinding America Down (Full Movie) FREE to watch for a limited time on Vimeo

January 21, 2013
Proposed Michigan Law Would Protect Gun Owners  - Pistol sales and permit records would not be subject to FOIA requests
By TOM GANTERT | Jan. 19, 2013 |   

    http://www.michiganvotes.org/
    Michigan's handgun owners could get an extra layer of privacy protection if a newly introduced Senate bill is passed and signed into law.
    Senate Bill 49 was introduced by Sen. Tom Casperson, R-Escanaba, and would keep state databases containing information on issued licenses private. It also would
    keep them from being subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
    Concealed pistol licenses in Michigan already are protected as private information under state law. However, pistol sales records and pistol sales permits are now
    protected only by case law, said Ryan Mitchell, a legislative staffer who researched the law for Sen. Mike Green’s office. It was ruled in the 1999 Michigan
    Supreme Court Case, Mager vs. the Michigan State Police, that pistol sales records and pistol sales permits were private information, but no law specifically says
    that.
    The Supreme Court ruling only gives the state police the option to deny FOIA requests, and doesn’t mandate it, said Patrick Wright, senior legal analyst for the
    Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Wright said if the state police wanted to, they could release the information.
    The state Supreme Court has the final authority but it would have a hard time justifying overturning the state law, Wright said.
    Language in the proposed bill states the information is confidential and "shall not be disclosed."
    “This really makes these protections concrete and sets them in stone." Mitchell said. "You don't want to be broadcasting to criminals the location of legally-owned
    firearms."
    Steven Dulan, a Lansing attorney and member of the NRA and the Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners applauded the bill.
    "This is a useful step from protecting Michigan gun owners from abuses similar to what happened in New York," Dulan said, adding that people who don't own
    guns also benefit from gun ownership being kept confidential because it forces "predators to think twice before breaking into anyone's home."
    Dulan was referring to the national furor created when The Journal Newsnewspaper in New York published the names and addresses of gun permit holders in their
    circulation area and included an online map showing the location of the homes of the gun owners.
    Since then, at least one person blames the map for his home being burglarized and there are reports that prisoners have told guards that they know where they live
    thanks to the newspaper. The state of New York legislature passed a law that allows gun owners a way to keep that information private.
    Mackinac Center legislative analyst Jack McHugh said the controversy generated by the newspaper publishing the names could make Senate Bill 49 one of the first
    Public Acts passed in 2013.
    "The stars are aligned for this bill," McHugh said.
    http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/18196
~submitted by Cathy C
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
QUOTES:

    John Maynard Keynes: "If governments should refrain from regulation ... the worthlessness of the money becomes apparent and the fraud upon the public
    can be concealed no longer." [Perhaps, just perhaps, this is what they are attempting to conceal]

    Founding Father James Madison
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments
    are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace negotiation, and foreign commerce;…The powers
    reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people,
    and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state." Federalist Papers No. 45  

    "Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is the history of resistance.
    The history of liberty is a history of the limitation of governmental power, not the increase of it." ~Woodrow Wilson

    The second amendment states: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not
    be infringed."

    "The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the
    best and most natural defense of a free country..." ~James Madison

    "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." (George Mason) Debates and other Proceedings of the Convention of
    Virginia,...taken in shorthand by David Robertson of Petersburg, at 271, 275 (2d ed. Richmond, 1805).

    "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. ... Whenever Governments mean to invade the
    rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." (Rep. Elbridge Gerry of
    Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment)

    "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot
    enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can
    be, on any pretense, raised in the United States" (Noah Webster in a pamphlet aimed at swaying Pennsylvania toward ratification) Noah Webster, "An
    Examination into the Leading Principals of the Federal Constitution...", in Paul Ford, ed., Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at 56(New
    York, 1888).
    More Quotes

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whatever your personal feelings are on this issue, this really has nothing to do with guns.  Guns are just a tool being used.

    This is an agenda that is being forced upon the American public contrary to anything that our forefathers envisioned.  
    It is very important for you to follow the links in this article to get the sense of the underlying agenda.  The worst part is
    that the "powers to be" will not stop at anything to push their agenda.

    It has been so long forgotten as to who really they are accountable to. Article Link

    "If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."    ~Joe Bannister
    "When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" ~Benjamin Franklin
~submitted by Steve

January 20, 2013  The "GIVE ME LIBERTY, OR GIVE ME DEATH"  Speech- PATRICK HENRY
    Excerpts from speech:
    "Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren,
    till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of
    those, who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of
    spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it."  

    "Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have
    supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne [US Federal/Corporate Government], and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical
    hands of the ministry [US President] and Parliament [US Congress]. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence
    and insult; our supplications have been disregarded, and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne [US Federal/Corporate
    Government!"

    "The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north [UN/DC] will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! 4 Our brethren are
    already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at
    the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"   
    READ COMPLETE SPEECH

    1828 Definition LIB'ERTY, n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]


    1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not confined; the will or mind is at
    liberty, when not checked or controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to restrain his actions or volitions.

    2. Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature. It is a state of exemption from
    the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life. This liberty is abridged by the establishment of government.

    3. Civil liberty, is the liberty of men in a state of society, or natural liberty, so far only abridged and restrained, as is necessary and expedient for the safety and
    interest of the society, state or nation. A restraint of natural liberty, not necessary or expedient for the public, is tyranny or oppression. civil liberty is an exemption
    from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. Hence the
    restraints of law are essential to civil liberty.

    The liberty of one depends not so much on the removal of all restraint from him, as on the due restraint upon the liberty of others.

    In this sentence, the latter word liberty denotes natural liberty.

    4. Political liberty, is sometimes used as synonymous with civil liberty. But it more properly designates the liberty of a nation, the freedom of a nation or state from
    all unjust abridgment of its rights and independence by another nation. Hence we often speak of the political liberties of Europe, or the nations of Europe.

    5. Religious liberty, is the free right of adopting and enjoying opinions on religious subjects, and of worshiping the Supreme Being according to the dictates of
    conscience, without external control.

    6. Liberty, in metaphysics, as opposed to necessity, is the power of an agent to do or forbear any particular action, according to the determination or thought of the
    mind, by which either is preferred to the other.

    Freedom of the will; exemption from compulsion or restraint in willing or volition.

    7. Privilege; exemption; immunity enjoyed by prescription or by grant; with a plural. Thus we speak of the liberties of the commercial cities of Europe.

    8. Leave; permission granted. The witness obtained liberty to leave the court.

    9. A space in which one is permitted to pass without restraint, and beyond which he may not lawfully pass; with a plural; as the liberties of a prison.

    10. Freedom of action or speech beyond the ordinary bounds of civility or decorum. Females should repel all improper liberties.

    To take the liberty to do or say any thing, to use freedom not specially granted.

    To set at liberty, to deliver from confinement; to release from restraint.

    To be at liberty, to be free from restraint.

    Liberty of the press, is freedom from any restriction on the power to publish books; the free power of publishing what one pleases, subject only to punishment for
    abusing the privilege, or publishing what is mischievous to the public or injurious to individuals.

    1828 Definition PAT'RIOTISM ,n. Love of one's country; the passion which aims to serve one's country, either in defending it from invasion, or protecting its
    rights and maintaining its laws and institutions in vigor and purity. Patriotism is the characteristic of a good citizen, the noblest passion that animates a man in the
    character of a citizen

January 18, 2013   GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

    From: isaiah
    Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:49 AM
    To: McSawyer
    Subject: : Obama Goes Nuts and Offers Anti-gunners Wish List

    The background check is voluntary and up to the dealer to decide to do it!! The catch is  if the dealer does not do the back ground check  he is adding
    himself to a possible liability.
    Where would the government get the funds to do any of this when they are broke now?  If the people would have Rallied in Washington DISTRICT OF  
    CRIMINALS as was requested  on 1/7/2013 and abolished
    this rogue government None of this would be a problem at all! It is time folks to come and stand together and take this country back.
    I'M GOING TO POST THIS ON MY WEB PAGE
    POSSIBLY HERE ALSO http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.org/news.html
             -----Forwarded Message-----
    From: Gun Owners of America
    Sent: Jan 18, 2013 12:38 AM
    To: Curtis  
    Subject: Obama Goes Nuts and Offers Anti-gunners Wish List  ARTICLE
~ submitted by Gray Beard   
My thought:
 ADDITIONAL IMPORTANT INFORMATION

January 16, 2013  El Paso County Board of Commissioners Takes a Stand

    Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:35 AM
    Subject: El Paso County Board of Commissioners Takes a Stand
    El Paso County in Colorado has unanimously passed a resolution that in El Paso County the legislation known as NDAA will not be enforced. The Board has
    taken this action in order to keep the oath that they took to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. They
    collectively see this legislation as being a flagrant violation of the Constitution.
    Please share this link with the members of your City Council as well as the members of your County's Board of Supervisors.
    El Paso County's Board of County Commissioners Nullify NDAA  READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C

My thought:  Good for El Paso at least the people are aware there is a problem, but unfortunately this single act is not going to fix the core problem, it is treating one of the
symptoms, does this mean to not do it, absolutely NOT!  What I'm saying is the defacto congress are giving a token to the people to appease them, but meanwhile the
TSA, HLS and the Patriot Act still exist.  So, it is another movement forward in their agenda with only a very small step backward towards their goal.

Please, please discern truth, and look at FREEDOM from the eagle's perspective.  He soars high and can see for miles, his ability to see ALL enables him to find what he
needs for survival.  Approach life in the same way, rise above the moment of urgency and constant confusion that is created and look further back in time to the original
seed of destruction, then bring that forward to our country and when it was planted to grow into what we have today.  This sounds cryptic but it is only for those seeking
real solutions  anchored in truth. Taking action based on truth is where our freedom lies, and many people believe they know the truth, and perhaps they do, but usually it
is a very small piece surrounded in much deception, but the micro bit of truth is the focus to the exclusion of all the deception it is wrapped in.  To heal our land we need
to restore the corner stone, the foundation  that all truth originates, all else is "busy work", vain and empty, sprouting nothing of real substance .  

Creating state legislation to make null and void the "Emergency War Powers Act of 1933, and all E.O. forward from that point would be more effective to bind the far-
reaching arm of the "police state", and/or at the very least, make null and void the Patriot Act, NDAA, and Obamacare in the states, and any new gun law legislation/E.O.
that will be passed. Meanwhile, they continue to play the groups like a fiddle to the completion of their agenda, and there is only one way to freedom, and it isn't by asking
the government/ taskmaster if we can have our rights back, but by restoring the one true King that loves all people.  The King that does not control, but gave us Free Will,
to choose to do what is right or what is wrong, but it is our choice and not the governments to decide. It is the governments responsibility to adhere to the BINDERS that
were placed on them by the law of this land that was established by the Ten Commandments (which were reduced to Two), our Bill of Rights and if these are not adhered
to we have the Declaration of Independence for remedy.  All we need to do is proclaim our "free will in truth", and take the "right action" to stop the destruction of our
nation and restore the sanctity of  life with equal rights for ALL people and religions.  The "majority rule, also known as Mob Rule" does not have a say in this, our De
Jure Republic does not allow for MOB RULE, this is why our founders gave us a REPUBLIC and NOT a Demon-ocracy.  Take a good long look at the war-torn countries
all around the world under the deception of "Demon-ocracy", then do the research for yourselves, and search for truth in all things. Remember this, true healing cannot be
found until one is "sick and tired" of being, sick and tired.  Equally one cannot be free until one steps out in faith to experience true freedom, it starts in the heart. <><

January 15, 2013   Gun Control Edition

    this was sent to all my congress critters
    ------- Original Message --------
    Subject:         gun control Michigan edition
    Date:         Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:32:35 -0500
    From:         isaiah
    To:         Senator Debbie Stabenow <senator@stabenow.senate.gov>

    Michigan edition
    for Michigan's Federal Senator
    Senator Debbie Stabenow

    Not having received a response to my last letter .
    I can only hope that you are hard at work teaching yourself, and the imposter Barry Soetoro(Barrack Husaine Obam) that neither congress nor the
    president with executive orders has any Authority, Power , OR RIGHT ,To infringe on a feel good compromise on the Second Amendment!
    Below is a response to another person on the second Amendment that should clear the air also comments and Definitions from that time in history by
    the web master, http://www.michiganfreedejurestate.org/news.html
~submitted by Gray Beard

My note:  The above message also included all the information from the post below, dated 1/14/13 - Well Regulated Militia vs. Constitutional Militia?  For sake of space,
and redundancy I didn't add it again with this message. So, read the above message then follow with the below message for accuracy of what was sent to congress.

January 14, 2013  WELL REGULATED MILITIA VS. CONSTITUTIONAL MILITIA?

    "The 2nd Amendment does not say anything about a Constitutional Militia, it states a Well Regulated Militia. This Amendment useing the term Well Regulated  has
    nothing at all to do with any government,  it in fact means that you are proficient in the use of your arms. It tells government  that they shall not infringe on  that
    right that is bestowed on us by our creator. In this country years ago we burned witches at the stake and also burned lawyers at the stake for practicing
    witchcraft. A constitutional militia will get you nowhere.  The  2nd Amendment was put in place so the people have a recourse against what we have in the White
    house today."  ~submitted by Gray Beard

    Second Amendment:
    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

    1828 Definition:   REG'ULATE, v.t.


    1. To adjust by rule, method or established mode; as, to regulate weights and measures; to regulate the assize of bread; to regulate our moral conduct by the laws
    of God and of society; to regulate our manners by the customary forms.  [emphasis added <><]

    2. To put in good order; as, to regulate the disordered state of a nation or its finances.[emphasis added <><]

    3. To subject to rules or restrictions; as, to regulate trade; to regulate diet.

    1913 Definition Regulate (regulate)
    v. t. (-lt)
    Reg"u*late
    [imp. *** p. p. Regulated (- l&amacr]`td); p. pr. *** vb. n. Regulating.] [L. regulatus, p. p. of regulare, fr. regula. See Regular.]

    1.To adjust by rule, method, or established mode] to direct by rule or restriction; to subject to governing principles or laws.
    The laws which regulate the successions of the seasons. Macaulay.

    The herdsmen near the frontier adjudicated their own disputes, and regulated their own police. Bancroft.

    1.To put in good order; as, to regulate the disordered state of a nation or its finances.  [emphasis added <><]
    1.To adjust, or maintain, with respect to a desired rate, degree, or condition; as, to regulate the temperature of a room, the pressure of steam, the speed of a
    machine, etc.
    To regulate a watch or clock, to adjust its rate of running so that it will keep approximately standard time.

    Syn. -- To adjust; dispose; methodize; arrange; direct; order; rule; govern.

My thought:  If you read the complete Second Amendment, then follow it with the definition of "regulate" from that era it certainly does give more clarity of what, and
why this Second Amendment is included in the BILL OF RIGHTS.  Our rights do NOT come from the Bill of Rights, our rights come from Almighty God, our Creator,
could this be why they worked so hard to strip all evidence of a Creator from all public records, including what has been taught to our children?

Our Bill of Rights is in place to BIND the power of the government, but WE the "well regulated militia," which is the PEOPLE, have failed to do OUR DUTY! Our De Jure
REPUBLIC WAS ENTRUSTED TO THE PEOPLE, but we didn't understand that in order to keep our De Jure Republic we had to keep Almighty God first in the
equation, for it was given to us by HIM, though many would say otherwise, and our greatest mistake was, "listening to them".  

Our de jure Republic is one of "self-governance by a virtuous people", which again, could be a solid argument for the peoples militia.  Have you noticed everything is
upside down, right is wrong, and serious criminals go free while good people go to jail for defending themselves against those that would do them harm?  We are now
living in a lawless, godless death culture, but it doesn't have to be!!  It is this way because we "SAY NOTHING".  If we want true lawful change and the bindings of our
founding documents on those put in positions to SERVE AND REPRESENT US, then we need to stand UNITED AND DEFEND THEM.  Not allow false new legislation
by the same usurpers to be put in place to quiet the people under the false illusion it will "protect us", we don't need their kind of protection, WE CAN, AND HAVE THE
RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES.

What we do need is to send them all home without severance pay and make things right with Almighty God first, and then return this country to its original freedom for
All PEOPLE, and the very first step to take would be to make null and void all the UCC laws and codes on the people restricting it to commercial only, as it should be.  
Restore the TEN COMMANDMENTS to our schools, we need to unwind the past 60 years of restrictive statues and codes placed on the people to liberate us, but move
forward with common sense, values, and principles based on natural/common law, release the new energy technologies that will free us from the tyranny of power.

The Ten Commandments isn't about "religion" as many will "scoff" and accuse it of such, especially those that are among the "lawless."  Our founding documents
were/are for ALL PEOPLE AND ALL RELIGIONS.  If our founding documents are adhered to, and most importantly the TEN COMMANDMENTS, nobody would have
to fear another race or religion, or lack of.  Basic human rights would be protected and all would be free to worship as they believe because they would not be allowed to
infringe on the rights or safety of others; in fact our FREE WILL would then be protected, as it was given to us since the beginning of time. Righteous law brings order,
peace, and justice, while unrighteous law creates tyranny with no justice for anyone.

The abuses that have taken place in the past under numerous  "religions" would be a personal choice to the individual if they decided to follow a religion that would subject
them to abusive laws, but this law could not be applied to society as a whole, and there would be the freedom to leave that religion at any time without recourse from
those controlling it.  

Our founding documents would stand as they are written and all the legal interpretations of confusion could be laid to rest, permanently.  This is true FREEDOM!  
Understanding, wisdom, common sense, logic, and the two greatest commandments that sum up the law is what is needed.  We can do this if we all search our heart for
truth, and realize there is "absolute truth, but it will not be found in a godless society.  IMO to properly enforce and defend the Second Amendment, ALL THE RIGHTS
THAT HAVE BEEN TRAMPLED NEED TO BE RESTORED TO THE PEOPLE, BECAUSE THEY ALL STAND OR THEY ALL FALL, and this is what they've been
doing all along, a slow erosion of our rights, had we so vigorously defended the others we'd not be at the edge of complete tyranny as we are today, Praise God, He also
gave us our Declaration of Independence, so there is remedy<><

January 13, 2013      COMMONWEALTH VS. CORPORATION - Is our de jure republic for Michigan a commonwealth or corporation, what say you?

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE  or watch VIDEO  ~submitted by Cathy C

    On Jan. 12, Sheriff Denny Peyman held a press conference & he explained that a Sheriff's supercede the powers of federal and state agents. Jackson County
    Kentucky Sheriff Denny Peyman has made it clear that gun laws which violate the United States Constitution or the Kentucky Constitution will not be enforced in
    his county. He has no intention of backing down. During the press conference, he took time to explain his powers as sheriff:
    I am responsible for the people inside this county. I am the highest elected official in this county, & this is the only opportunity the people have to speak for
    themselves and say 'this is what we want.'
    I can ask federal people to leave, they have to leave. I can ask state people to leave, they have to leave. & it doesn't matter what laws Obama passes, the sheriff has
    more power than the federal people.
    He said that if federal gun-grabbers don't understand this, then "they need to go back and study it," because Kentucky "is a commonwealth."
    Sheriff Denny Peyman represents everything good and brave about America, and about the great state of Kentucky. He is a patriot, first class. Investigate
    Oathkeepers. We are organizing police and military to honor their oath to the constitution. [emphasis added <><]

The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope (Paperback) by Sheriff Richard Mack   PURCHASE

    1828 Definition:    COMMONWEALTH, n.

    1. An established form of government, or civil polity; or more generally, a state; a body politic, consisting of a certain portion of men united by compact or tacit agreement, under one
    form of government and system of laws. This term is applied to the government of Great Britain, which is of a mixed character, and to other governments which are considered as free or
    popular, but rarely or improperly, to an absolute government. A commonwealth is properly a free state; a popular or representative government; a republic; as the commonwealth of
    Massachusetts. The word signifies strictly, the common good or happiness; and hence, the form of government supposed best to secure the public good.

    2. The whole body of people in a state the public.

    3. The territory of a state; as, all the land within the limits of the commonwealth.

My thought:  Yes, according to our founders we were/are a Commonwealth or Republic.  In the past I have purchased this book to give away to others.  We have Sheriff
Mack video's on our
video resource page, and I suggest everyone research OATHKEEPERS  and follow your heart.  Will you continue to go along just to get along?  
There are worse things than death and to live in fear is one of them! <><

    “The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property
    they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no
    human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army”
    -- Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island

January 12, 2012   Grand Jury
    I would just like to say that I think we should be bringing grand jury indictments against all MI politicians who are not demanding Obama be tried for
    treason!! All this other stuff we can deal with latter. At this time we have no lawful anything, we must start holding our politicians accountable.
    www.citizensgrandjury.com
~submitted by David W    
[ CITIZENS GRAND JURY MANUAL]

January 11, 2013   TO DEFACTO SENATOR CARL LEVIN:

    Senator Levin

    We will start off with the gun control issue.
     You are hereby put on notice that congress and the president have no authority to infringe on the peoples rights!!
     The second Amendment is very clear where it tells government you SHALL NOT INFRINGE!! THAT MEANS YOU CANNOT PASS GUN CONTROL
    LAWS
     THE BEST THING YOU COULD DO  IS PASS A FEDERAL CARRY LAW FOR ALL NATURAL; BORN CITIZENS THAT ARE NOT CONVICTED OF
    A FELONY. THAT SUPERSEDES ALL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, With Barry Soetoro(Barrack Hussain Obamba no documentation of name
    change) not being eligible to hold the office he has extorted !
    We will hold anything you pass as null in void.
    Remember that a armed society is a peaceful society.

    Tax Reform
     With the fact that anybody that can get on the internet can look up and find the facts that the IRS and Federal Reserve are not any part of our      
    government!
    The best thing you can do is abolish the so call income tax IRS and the federal reserve and replace it with nothing!!!
      Just think what a impact this will have on stimulating the economy???
      We do not need a full time congress so cut your work day and pay to help put the economy back on its feet!
                     ~submitted by Gray Beard

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wyoming To Preserve the Second Amendment

I
n response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to take action to hold the
Federal Government to its constitutional limits under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to
keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104. the Firearms Protection Act. Representatives Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller, Piiparinen, Reeder and
Winters and Senators Dockstader and Hicks have co-sponsered this bill.
Wyoming’s Firearms Protection Act, is “an act relating to firearms; providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a
magazine of a firearm or other limitation on in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; providing a penalty; and providing for an effective date.” This act nullifies all
federal laws made after Jan. 1, 2013.
“We need the second amendment because it is the protection for all of our other rights. Without it, those rights have no protection,” Kroeker said.
READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C

[My thought - why do we have to once again create legislation for rights we already have? Didn't the "DICK ACT" supposedly do this?  By creating more legislation we
are in essence saying our founding documents do not carry the weight of the law or our RIGHTS... They are eroding our founding foundation and we are allowing them
to do so by continuously feeling the need to legislate for more protection, ENFORCE what we already have in place!!   Doesn't the Tenth Amendment support and defend
the rights of the free states that are supposed to defend the rights of its people?  I'm not saying this isn't good, I'm just saying, "think deeper than the surface" because to
me it is yet another law and what good is it if the people will not defend what we already have?  It is an attempt to appease the people, but by agreeing to this we are
actually admitting our founding documents mean nothing!  Such political games, no wonder the people aren't listened to anymore.  This nullifies all federal laws made after
Jan 1, 2013 only, what about all the other laws put into place such as the Patriots Act, the NDAA?  It also states we need the Second Amendment to protect our other
rights, really?   We've had our other rights and the second amendment and how has it stopped our "other rights" from being taken?   Please people, discern truth,  the way
to protect OUR RIGHTS IS TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE AND WHERE THEY COME FROM, and it isn't from government.   When we allow one right to be diluted by
deception and misinterpretation, we opened the door to losing all our rights as we are witnessing today.  Let us not be fooled again by being deceived with more false
hopes of new legislation that will supposedly protect our rights, the TRUTH is, WE MUST PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AS THEY WERE WRITTEN BY OUR FOUNDING
FATHERS, they knew what we were up against <><]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
THE LAW  by Frederic Bastiat
Posted by Keith B

The Law, by Frederic Bastiat with a forward by Walter E. Williams. (2007, Foundation for Economic Freedom; ISBN-13: 978-1-57246-214-4).
The Law is must reading for anyone who wants to understand what law ought to be. It was written by a Frenchman, Bastiat, and published around 1850, which was quite
some time ago. But this slim volume, just 77 pages with supplementary materials like its index, is not difficult to read. In a short space, it fully explains the premises of
liberty, a free society and free markets.
A lot of people skip introductions and forewards. But I urge you to read the foreward by Walter Williams. He summarizes well much of what Bastiat explains, namely, that
“the greatest single threat to liberty is government.”
The most important concept that you can get from this book is Bastiat’s explanation of legal plunder. He tells us to look at our government and its laws: “See if the law
takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by
doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.”
As Williams notes, “with such an accurate description of legalized plunder, we cannot deny that most government activities, . . . are legalized plunder, or for the sake of
modernity, legalized theft.” So right he is.
Bastiat sums up the proper role of law in this way:
“The law is the organization of the natural right of self defense. It is the substitution of common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the
individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all.” In
other words, the law’s “mission is to protect persons and property.” The law is not meant to legalize plunder, or be the source of “organized injustice.”
Bastiat addresses the tyranny of socialism, how socialists want to play God, and how they actually despise Mankind, contrary to what they profess. He also explains how
socialists typically want to deny or ignore reason and facts and how they want to regiment people – and how, ultimately, they want tyranny. It’s not just that socialism
results in tyranny, but that tyranny is what socialists want to impose, that tyranny is ultimately their goal.
And, all of this was written in 1850 in France!  [you'd think he was writing it today <><]
Don’t just read the foreward. Read all of Bastiat’s work, so you can understand what law ought to be.  
HERE FOR VIDEO AND TEXT

    Quotes from "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat
    "The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks
    to live at the expense of everybody else."

    “But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them and gives it to other
    persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without
    committing a crime.”

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law".
    "There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many persons have
    erroneously held that things are “just” because the law makes them so."

    “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed
    beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.”

    “It is not because men have made laws, that personality, liberty, and property exist. On the contrary, it is because personality, liberty, and property
    exist beforehand, that men make laws. What, then, is law? As I have said elsewhere, it is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful
    defense.”
    “As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose--that it may violate property instead of protecting it--then everyone will
    want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder.”

    "The law is guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish".
    "See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one
    citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay, for it
    is not only an evil itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it invites reprisals."  READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C.

January 09, 2013    SENT TO ME  - YOU DECIDE IT'S IMPORTANCE

    "To all militia members in Michigan....Support the Patriot Union and Veteran Defenders of America initiative for States Rights now Through the Balance of powers
    Act...Things are moving, we need your support....."
    .~submitted by JJ

[I posted this when I received it before I did research, I will leave it up, but the Patriots Union is a LLC with a fee to join.  Check out the document link the
Balance of Powers Act and look at the address at the bottom, it says a great deal since it is a corporation,  and I haven't checked the Veteran Defenders of America yet.  I
will post more information as I receive it.
Here is another document I found doing a search, perhaps someone can look at this and discern for validity then compare it to
the patriot unions document for validity as well, it is nice to receive feedback from others TIA]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
WHO SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT......WHERE DOES TRUE JUSTICE LIE?
Every time there is a mass shooting, staged or not, there is an agenda that follows:  someone must pay!  Doesn't really matter who or what, but there must be retribution,
and ah yes! The defacto politicians always just happen to have the solution...there mantra for years has been to band guns, disarm the American people.  

What we don't realize is we're in the pot and the water is getting hot, close to the boiling point (for those that do not know, I'm referring to the frog science, if you put a
frog in boiling water they know and will quickly jump out, but if you put that frog in cold water and slowly turn up the heat it will cook to death because it gradually
adjusts to the temperature without knowing it is being cooked).  

When was the frog (America) put in the pot of cold water, almost as soon as we were liberated by our Declaration of Independence, but I'll fast forward to current events
and our Second Amendment right, when was it put in the pot of cold water, probably when we didn't say no to the registering of our firearms or when we didn't say no to
the law that Felons could not own firearms, and that law was a huge step towards where we are today, because that law made it possible to reduce more firearm owners
by creating more felons, elementary my dear Watson!  There wasn't even a time limit put on this "felon denial of firearms" so if a person truly had a change of heart, as
we most do as we get older, even after ten or twenty years they still could not legally own a firearm. Praise God, He forgives, even if the US Corporate government does
not.  To make it worse maybe the felony didn't even  involve a firearm, wonderful justice isn't it?   Registering firearms put us in the pot, Regulating turned up the heat,
Allowing a ban on ANY firearm is bringing us to a full boil!    Saying NO is jumping out before we completely boil!

Do we have laws on the books against crime, of course we do but we, the people are manipulated by mainstream media (MSM) to get caught in the emotion of the
moment and their continuous brainwashing of "misplaced blame."  I think ALL people, no matter the race, ideology, religion, faith, or indifference will agree that as a
society we do NOT KILL, STEAL, OR LIE.  This is why we have laws to prosecute those that do not adhere to this basic moral code or law. When you make politics
and/or money your god there is no foundation for truth to stand on.  If you are a murderer, thief or liar, would you legislate against it?  Or would you redirect blame
elsewhere and in an arena that would provide for even greater control and security against those that know the truth and will stop you?  Our protection is first, our
Creator, second our Bill of Rights, third our Declaration of Independence, and last our Constitution.  Their security is removing these protections given us by our very
wise founding fathers.  TRUTH  NEVER BECOMES OBSOLETE... IT'S ETERNAL..

When is the last time you heard anyone demand "CAPITAL PUNISHMENT" for murder or rape?  We have the technology today to absolutely convict most crimes on
DNA alone, why isn't this information being used to enforce JUSTICE  and rid society of those that perpetrate such evil against innocent people?  Could it be they are
protecting themselves and those they assign to certain tasks for them?  How quickly would murder and rape disappear if the criminal were given the death sentence?  
Could it be that we no longer seek justice because of our own nature and ability to do what we know we shouldn't be doing? Crimes that leave a victim in its wake need to
be dealt with harshly, but how is it true justice or protecting the people by placing more regulations and laws on those that do not break the law?  Where is the logic and
common sense in this? Some might even say, wait a minute, what about forgiveness?  Yes, we are to forgive but forgiveness does not always negate consequences to
criminal actions that take another's life, does forgiveness bring them back, no it doesn't, neither does capital punishment, but when one human being willfully and
deliberately takes another human beings life it should be a capital offense to deter others from carrying out the same action.  Again "misplaced blame" if murderers were
given a death sentence it certainly would make people think about what they are about to do and what it will cost them, but when their crimes are just passed onto the law
abiding people, there is no real deterrent against the crime, and people are still dying, but INNOCENT people instead of the guilty, its insanity!

When have you heard our legislatures target "VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES"?  Oh, there might be a mention here and there, but no, their goal is to disarm their greatest fear!  
There was an excellent episode of Touched By An Angel on last night (GMC) it was called, "Virtual Reality Series" and I suggest every parent view that episode, it is  #918
and was released in 2003.  Please view this show and share with others.  I think it can be watched on tv.com but not sure.  You'll have to do your own homework on that
one but if you have children and are concerned about what is happening I strongly suggest you watch it and rethink your allowing your children to continuously play
violent video games that "train and desensitize" them to become Killers, there is a connection whether you want to acknowledge it or not.

Then there is the psychotropic drugs that our children and young people are getting now, with more frequency than antibiotics and vaccinations!  There is a list that was
mentioned on a radio program of the drug that each mass murderer was taking, or just coming off,  at the time of their shootings, and all of the shootings that have taken
place psychotropic drugs were involved.  Why isn't there a loud cry for these to be banned?  Yes, there are some calling for it, but nothing will happen because that is not
their agenda, but they will use this symptom to turn the burner up higher.  Instead of banning psychotropic drugs they will again decree that anyone using psychotropic
drugs cannot own firearms and it will be so broad in language it will again reduce our armed population, and isn't it curious that one of the first things they do is medicate
our veterans  how handy is that?  And so many of our children have been or currently are medicated so actually banning guns is all saber rattling because they know
exactly what they are doing, and the compromise the people will make to keep their second amendment right is to allow the denial of firearms to people that take
prescription medications, of course, at first it will only be the psychotropic drugs, and hey, I don't use those. The NEW healthcare plan gives no patient/doctor
confidentiality to anyone and your doctor is dictated to by DC on the care you can and cannot receive.  When the medical records show that psychotropic drugs have
been taken, it will be the same as felony charges, you will be forever banned from owning firearms legally.  The water is ready to boil America, do you feel it yet?

The grass roots people can see and understand the problems, they have good common sense and know right from wrong.  If the people can see the root problem why is it
that we are being made to believe that most Americans don't?  Remember the MSM is very controlled.  Only stories that are fabricated towards their agenda will be
released to the public.  Not all alternative media can be believed either.  People, we have to discern truth for ourselves, connect with one another, share notes of what we
know to be true based on actual documented fact, and even then it still could be questionable.  We do know biblical truths, principles, and values; and maybe if we model
these for others and let our voices be heard for truth and Justice, just maybe, by the grace of Almighty God, He'll hear from Heaven and heal our land, if it is in
accordance with His Will. <><  

In God Is Our Trust,
Bonnie Frownfelter
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
JURAL ASSEMBLIES - OLD FASHIONED TOWNHALL MEETINGS - PUBLIC MEETING OF, BY, AND FOR THE PEOPLE - YOU PICK!

Reach out to people in your local communities face to face by holding town hall meetings, build jural assemblies in your area to bring a voice of the people to your local
government.  Do not attempt to approach your local government  alone, but do your ground work first in bringing the people together, then as a group, and a fairly large
group, approach those that hold elected positions, especially your local sheriff.    The local sheriff is supposed to serve and protect the people that elect him/her.  If they
will not honor their oath and work for you, replace him/her with someone that will.  Depending how large your geographical location is will determine the size of the group
that will be needed to have a strong voice in your community.
This can be done by publishing in the local paper that a town hall meeting for the people is going to take place with the date, time, and location of the meeting included.  
You can also reach people by handing out flyers or maybe even knocking on your neighbor’s door to get acquainted.  If you hold a meeting, let the first meeting just be a
meet and greet with a brief summary of the coming agendas.  Ask for input about what they’d like to discuss and what their complaints are, usually zoning is an issue in
most communities because of Sustainable Development, which is the new political correctness for the Agenda 21 Agenda.  Try to find out what is affecting them the most
in your area, whether it is regulations on businesses, traffic violations (speed traps) excessive taxes etc.    When the problems that concern them are brought to the table
then offer to help them find a solution, this does not mean to do it for them, but help them and others to be proactive in solving the problems, and this is where the Jural
Assembly comes into being.
Do not immediately start talking about all the “conspiracy theory” information.  We know it is fact, but most do not.  People don’t care how much you know, until they
know how much you care!  Let the first meeting just be about growing awareness and fellowship in the community for support of one another, a true, “of, by, and for the
people” working together as a community for solutions, and to educate them about the usurpation of our de jure republic.
In the coming days I will speak more on procedures and how to effectively gain control over the agenda’s that are being implemented in your local areas.   <><

January 07, 2013  Sermon - Christian Patriot - Boston, 1840
July 05, 1840
Rev. Mellish Irving Motte (1801-1881) was originally from Charleston, South Carolina. He obtained a Bachelors of Arts from Harvard in 1821 and became pastor of the
South Congregational Church in Boston on May 21, 1828. In this 1840 sermon, Rev. Motte encourages Christians to fully engage the culture, especially in the political
arena. He decries politicians acting out of self-interest and greed rather than making decisions based upon what is morally right and wrong. Motte insists that religious
morality is the very first manifestation of true patriotism and "Public virtue is the strongest spirit of national vitality." He reminds his listeners that nations must be judged in
the present since they do not exist in eternity and national ruin awaits national unrighteousness. Rev. Motte states that America's Fathers founded the country on Christian
principles and intended for the United States to be a Christian nation. According to Motte, the realization of this goal is to be found in individual piety and allegiance to
righteousness over any political party. Excerpt from the  sermon:

    "And, then, to make all that is given to us safe for us, and to expect a blessing continuance, we must remember God, and insist on a religious morality as the
    very first manifestation of a true patriotism. Ay, patriotism, that most abused words. Alas! That it is every vaunted and bravadoed by the scoffer and the
    profligate, not knowing, that blessed is that people, and that alone, whose God is the Lord. Without him they may speak great swelling words of vanity; but
    bombastic professions and oratorical displays are not the disinterested self-denial and sober toils of a virtuous citizen, who fears God and honors
    government, and serves and saves the state without boasting. He alone is a patriot. By such alone the country stands.

    The Ruler of nations hath uttered the decree. From beginning of time his world has illustrating it. As surely as he is just and the King of nations as of
    individuals; as surely as there is truth taught by experience, and the unvarying certainty of the same effects from the same causes, according to the natural
    constitution he has impressed on his universe, the past, in all quarters of the globe, bids us look well to it. You may be the traitor within the garrison, though
    treason to the country be furthest from your thoughts. You may invoke ruin upon it when you are shouting, louder than any, the glory of its institutions.
    You may be the deadly enemy, though you shed your blood for it. Look into the nature of things. When hath a righteous nation perished? Where is there one
    doing justice and judgment, and it is not well with it? Public virtue is the strongest spirit of national vitality; and private virtue is the life-blood, coursing
    through every artery and vein, large and small, of the public institutions.

    On the other hand, is it not undeniable from reason, scripture, and experience, that predominance of selfish principles and corrupt morals is the unfailing
    cause of calamities, perplexities, and ruin in a country? Reason tells us, that the character of the Judge of all the earth is the pledged to have it so. Vice, in
    the individual, may not always meet its retribution, nor virtue its reward, in this world, because there is to be another, of more perfect retribution for
    individuals. But nations exist here alone. Unlike the soul, they are annihilated at their temporal dissolution. Therefore, if their fortunes and fate be subject of
    the Divine Providence, to their present existence, which is the only one, must be applied the principle of its moral rule."
    Read complete  SERMON

[Until "We, the people" are willing to see the true root of the problem in American there can be no true change for we, the people.  Almighty God, through His biblical
principles needs to be re-crowned KING over our land, or we need to strike "In God We Trust" and "GOD BLESS AMERICA" from all public records as it has been
suggested in the past.  Our de jure republic is one of "SELF-GOVERNANCE" that springs forth from a virtuous people, if the virtuous people of America are unwilling to
stand up, unite and let their voice be heard to make these corrections, and to do it right where we are in our communities, and if we are not willing to get involved face to
face then we need to quietly go back to our "lukewarm" life to wallow in what we blindly think is safe and secure until one day we are no longer able to bury our head in
the sand because the sand is gone.  It is time for Almighty God's "Christian Soldiers" to unite peaceably, but with a STRONG RESOLVE, we've been quiet too long <><]

January 06, 2013  From the Canada Press:  The War Against The UN Agenda 21 Just Got Hotter  by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh
The war against U.N. Agenda 21 just got hotter in Virginia. Thinking Americans understand now what U.N. Agenda 21 is and are not backing down from fighting the anti-
American, anti-prosperity, wealth redistribution scheme of the United Nations against our way of life.

The U.N. has deemed commercial agriculture unsustainable and has used taxpayer dollars and local supervisors to re-zone, re-shape, and prohibit land use for local
agriculture or building that is not approved by their bio-diversity plan of limiting human habitation – all in the name of saving the planet.

Our planet does not need saving, Mother Earth is doing fine . The problem lies with progressive humans in positions of power who want to control everything we do
while they line their pockets with our hard-earned taxpayer dollars.

Unfair regulatory actions against Martha Boneta, a farmer in Fauquier County, Virginia, “violate fundamental rights and unfairly restrict her property rights.” Delegate L.
Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge/31st district) plans to strengthen Virginia’s Right to Farm Act and to “protect farmers against future encroachments by local
government.”
 READ MORE

[The above action is exactly why people need to find out what is happening in your LOCAL area's.  We can no longer sit back and say nothing just because it does not
affect us, because it is affecting us and the quality of our food.  It is the independent farmers that are being driven out of business so the big AG Farms have total control.  
This is what the UN Agenda 21, also know as "SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT" is doing here and around the world.  We need to stand behind these local businesses
and support them with our business and our VOICE <><

January 04, 2013  House Speaker John Boehner’s address to the opening session of the 113th Congress (Transcript)
This might mean something and it might not, he is a politician and we know they say pretty much anything to appease the people, but I'm an eternal optimist so I choose
to hope it reveals that the scales are starting to tip back towards our constitutional Republic of, by, and for the people, however, being also the realist that I am the opening
line is a red flag but I do know time reveals all:

    HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER: Leader Pelosi, members of the House and Senate, dear family and friends, fellow countrymen:

    We meet again at democracy’s great port of call. Every two years, at this hour, the Constitution brings a new order to this House. It is an interlude for
    reflection, a glimpse of old truths.
    To our new members and their families, welcome. You are likely feeling awestruck right about now. History runs through here. And now you are among a
    select few to share in this privilege.  
    For those who are returning, who have walked these aisles before, maybe it’s time we feel awestruck again.
    The way our founders envisioned it, the republic would be led by citizens who recognize that the blessing of governing ourselves requires that we give
    something of ourselves. Everything depended on this. So they made each other – and their successors – swear an oath of allegiance.
    In a few moments, I will take this oath for the twelfth time as representative of the Eighth District of Ohio. It is word for word the same oath we all take.
    Note that it makes no mention of party, faction, or title … contains no reference to agendas or platforms – only to the Constitution
    The one addition we dare to make, as George Washington did at the first inaugural, is to invoke the assistance of our Heavenly Father.
    This covenant makes us servants of posterity. It calls us to refuse the pull of passing interests and follow the fixed star of a more perfect union.
    Put simply, we are sent here not to be something, but to do something – to do the right thing.
    It’s a big job, and it comes with big challenges.
    Our government has built up too much debt. Our economy is not producing enough jobs. These are not separate problems.
    At $16 trillion and rising, our national debt is draining free enterprise and weakening the ship of state.
    The American Dream is in peril so long as its namesake is weighed down by this anchor of debt. Break its hold, and we begin to set our economy free. Jobs
    will come home. Confidence will come back.

    We do this not just to boost GDP or reduce unemployment, but to secure for our children a future of freedom and opportunity. Nothing is more important.
    As Washington wrote in his farewell address, we should not “throw upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear.”
    Well, the burden is ours and so is the opportunity.
    There is no substitute for the wisdom of the people. We are their servants. As Speaker, I pledge to listen and do all I can to help you carry out the oath you
    are about to take.
    Because in our hearts, we know it is wrong to pass on this debt to our kids and grandkids. Now we have to be willing – truly willing – to make this right.
    Public service was never meant to be an easy living. Extraordinary challenges demand extraordinary leadership.
    So if you have come here to see your name in lights or to pass off political victory as accomplishment, you have come to the wrong place. The door is
    behind you.
    If you have come here humbled by the opportunity to serve; if you have come here to be the determined voice of the people; if you have come here to carry
    the standard of leadership demanded not just by our constituents but by the times, then you have come to the right place.
    There is a time to every purpose under Heaven. For the 113th Congress, it is a time to rise. When the day is over, and the verdict is read, may it be said that
    we well and faithfully did our duty to ensure freedom will endure and prevail.    So help us God. END

January 03, 2013   Do Not Fear Hypothetical Dangers (excerpt from, "HOW TO WIN THE WAR FOR YOUR MIND" by Brandon Smith, link below)
    "Fear is the weapon of choice when it comes to totalitarian proponents. Conquering armies and bureaucracies are notorious for exaggerating their strength and
    numbers in order to squelch the fighting spirit of those they intend to rule. Genghis Kahn, for instance, used the tactic of exaggerated numbers, along with vicious
    genocide, to strike terror in regions he had not yet attempted to overtake. Upon his arrival, the Mongol hordes had received such a reputation (some of it fabricated)
    that many regions surrendered immediately without question.

    When becoming an activist against a criminal establishment, it is very common to be the target of fear campaigns. Today, those of us in the liberty movement hear
    warnings from “random” concerned parties constantly telling us that our efforts are “all for nothing,” that we are “making ourselves targets.” That the globalist
    system is far too strong and far too advanced to be defeated. That they have predator drones and NSA databases and soldiers without empathy etc, etc.

    Their hope is to make us afraid of hypothetical situations which can neither be confirmed nor denied. To make us obsess over the "odds" rather than the objective.
    In other words, they hope to encourage a state of mass cowardice. To undo this tactic, you must remain focused on your goal regardless of the possible danger.
    That is to say, the strength of the enemy, whether real or fantasy, is irrelevant. It is meaningless. Goliath is nothing but an obstacle, and all obstacles can be dealt
    with. Move forward toward the objective and never stop " READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
~submitted by Cathy C.

January 02, 2013    An Email to Send to Your County Sheriff
The following letter is a sample of a letter that I suggest that you email to your County Sheriff. We need hundreds if not thousands of Patriots to send emails to their
County Sheriff. We need to find out which of the Sheriffs are working for the people and which ones are working for the Federal government. Copy the following letter
and send it to all of your friends and neighbors and ask them to do the same. Ask everyone to email their Sheriff and demand that he or she make a commitment to honor
their oath of office.

    Dear Sheriff ________________,
    As the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in _______________County you were required to take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution
    against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Having taken that oath I would like to know if you will honor your oath by refusing to enforce Federal rules,
    regulations and directives that violate the Constitution and/or the Bill of Rights.
    The Second Amendment clearly proclaims that the people have a right to own guns and in the Bill of Rights, the government is prohibited from infringing on
    the right of the people to own guns if they choose to do so. Your primary job is to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and the rights of the people
    that live in ______________ our County.
    The Supreme Court has ruled that the Federal government has no lawful jurisdiction in the counties and that when a Sheriff chooses to enforce an
    unconstitutional directive, he is violating his Constitutional Oath.
    The people of _______________ County are the employer and you are the employee and we expect you to represent us and not the Federal government. As
    your employer, I would like to know if you are given an order that violates the Constitution, will you honor your oath or will you do as directed by the
    President of the United States.
    Sincerely,
    xxxx  xxxxxxxx [your name here]
    (xxx) xxx-xxxx  [your phone number here]
~submitted by Keith B

[It might be good to refer to the "Dick Act of 1902" or more properly known as the "Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654" as well; it can be found HERE.
The Dick Act’s most quoted synopsis is: The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-
control laws.   
 MILITIA HANDBOOK- Regulations for the Organized Militia

Send a letter if you cannot email, call or even better, stop in and talk to him/her face to face.  Relationships are built on a better foundation when started in person or at
least on the phone where a real voice can be heard.  Email can sometimes project a different tone than the one intended. Which brings me to the below message I also
received <><]

    Subject: It is Your Patriotic Duty
    I am requesting that someone or a group of individuals make an appointment to visit with your County Sheriff and that you ask him or her if they will honor their
    oath of office and preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against unconstitutional Federal rules and regulations. The voters in each County needs to know if
    their Sheriff will honor their oath or turn their back on their Constituents and the Constitution that they have sworn to defend.
    Every County Sheriff needs to sign a pledge to honor their oath and it is the responsibility of Patriots like yourself to hold them accountable. Will you contact your
    Sheriff and ask him to honor his oath? If you are willing to do so, please let us at the Constitutional Sheriff's Website know if your Sheriff is working for the people
    or the criminals on Capitol Hill.
~submitted by WRAM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
excerpt from the "
REGULATIONS FOR THE ORGANIZED MILITIA- 1910"
War Department,
March 12, 1910.
The following regulations governing the Organized Militia of the several States, Territories, and the District of Columbia, in its relations with the War Department, under
the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and the laws of Congress thereunder, are promulgated for the guidance of all concerned, and will be strictly
observed.
J. M. Dickinson,
Secretary of War.

Official:
E. M. Weaver,
Colonel, General Staff Corps,
Assistant to the Chief of Staff)
Chief of Division.

    ARTICLE I.
    constitutional provisions pertaining to the militia and
    Federal Laws Enacted in Accordance Therewith.

    1. The relations of the War Department to the Organized Militia
    of the several States, Territories, and District of Columbia are governed
    by the provisions of the Constitution of the United States
    which pertain to the militia and by the federal laws which have been
    enacted by Congress pursuant to the authority conferred by the
    constitutional provisions. These constitutional provisions and federal
    laws may be enumerated as follows:
    constitutional provisions.

    2. A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a
    free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
    infringed. (Art. II, amendments.) [emphasis mine]

    3. The Congress shall have power * * *
    (a) To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of
    the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
    (b) To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia
    and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the
    service of the United States, reserving to the States, respectively, the
    appointment of the officers and the authority of training the militia
    according to the discipline prescribed by Congress. (Art. I, sec. 8.)
    (c) To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
    into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested
    by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any
    department or officer thereof. (Art. I, sec. 8.)

    4. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United
    States of America. (Art. II, sec. 1.)

    5. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and
    Navy of the United States and of the militia of the several States
    when called into the actual service of the United States. (Art. II,
    sec. 2.)

    6. The United States shall guarantee to every State in. this Union
    a republican form of government, [emphasis mine] and shall protect each of them
    against invasion; and on application of the legislature or of the
    executive (when the legislature can not be convened) against domestic
    violence. (Art. IV, sec.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
VERY IMPORTANT UP-DATE
I received the following information from Donna Streier concerning Tim Turner's court case.  I'm posting it for those that would like an update on his case and others that
would like the information for educational purposes or both.  There are links to the attachments that were included with it:

    January 1, 2013
    Dear Free State Governors:
    Attached is a follow-up filing into President Turner’s case. It is actually a Criminal Complaint that is being filed with the United States House and Senate Judiciary
    Committee at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington D.C.  PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE IN YOUR RESPECTIVE STATES!
    The House and Senate Judiciary Committee handles oversight of matters concerning the Department of Justice, the FBI and Territorial Courts, especially actions
    criminal in nature, whenever it is known that a judge or justice official commits a felony to conspire against an accused as has been done against James Timothy
    Turner.
    Listed below is a quick and brief synopsis of the attached filing. Reading of the actual eleven page filing is more in-depth and thorough. Be sure to look up all the
    referenced laws, acts, citations, cases, etc.
    The United States District Courts only have jurisdiction over civil cases and not criminal, as they have fraudulently claimed with Mr. Turner. The United States
    District Court of Alabama’s actions are under Color of Law. The judge in Mr. Turner’s case has violated his oath of office and is actually practicing law, by
    preventing Mr. Turner from filing anything into his case.
    The United States District Court of Alabama has denied and restricted Mr. Turner from his fundamental and Constitutional right to “assistance of counsel” by
    forcing him to employ counsel. The United States District Court of Alabama has denied Mr. Turner from Due Process of Law.
    Most of the charges against Mr. Turner are based on Title 18 of the United States Code; but, Title 18 is not law because it was never passed according to the
    quorum clause of the Constitution, Article 1, Section 5.
    A serious charge in the attached Criminal Complaint is against the Dept. of Justice for representing a foreign entity which in this case is the Internal Revenue
    Service, which is Fraud on the Court.
    Many of the charges in Mr. Turner’s case are direct violations of the Citizen Protection Act of 1998, such as “absence of probable cause seeking indictment”,
    “acting to impede right of discovery”, “failure to release information that would exonerate”, “attempting to influence/limit testimony to grand jury”, and failure to
    allow his right to defend himself before the Grand Jury in violation of the Constitution.

    These allegations could also very well lead to a violation of the Anti-Kickback Act by all the government participants involved. This is a very serious crime
    frequently committed these days in our country by courts and law enforcement officers who use prisoner’s names and case numbers by constructing “prisoner
    bonds,” using people as chattel to profit the government itself, public and private prisons and the large corporations who invest in these fraudulent securities.
    ANY ONE of these numerous charges would lead to an immediate dismissal of James Timothy Turner’s case and for his immediate release from incarceration. The
    system we are under in our country has gotten by with all of the above injustices and this needs to stop. Your help is needed to get these things out to the public
    immediately. “They” will not like to see this. Our public exposure of these gross injustices will go a very long way in helping our President and all our fellow
    Americans.
    The TRUTH is that Tim Turner did NOT commit any crimes; the only crimes here are the ones committed by the very judicial system set up to protect the
    innocent!  We are asking and imploring everyone reading this material to send it out to everybody you know.
    We need everyone to write to their Washington D.C. Senators and Representatives! You can find their contact information at http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.
    shtml. Write up a simple note of complaint and include the attached 11 page filing.
    If each of us does not stand up now, we are likely to be in a similar situation one day.

    ATTENTION: We will be setting up a website this week solely for this cause. We are very serious! More exposure will be coming out. Documentation will also be
    made available to help the people who face various legal entanglements. PLEASE stay tuned!    
    PS: Also included is a “Bill of Particulars” that is being filed directly to the US District Court of Alabama
~submitted by Donna S

JANUARY 1, 2013 THE BEGINNING OF ANOTHER NEW YEAR, AND A NEW BEGINNING...GOD PLEASE FORGIVE US AND RESTORE OUR LAND!!

"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America
than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued;
but when once they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external
or internal invader. "
~Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779
[1828 Webster Dictionary: "Virtue is nothing but voluntary obedience to truth".]

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers."
~Thomas Jefferson
"We...the people" of Michigan
have inhabited our     FREE DE JURE STATE
Archived 2013 First Quarter